Rachel Reeves’ Spending Review headache
When do “efficiency savings” become cuts?
ByNew Times,
New Thinking.
When do “efficiency savings” become cuts?
ByIn our new age of fiscal stringency, Gareth Davies will be the man marking the government's homework.
ByAmong the ridiculous complaints, excuses and conspiracies, the ex-prime minister makes one important point.
ByIn Ten Years to Save the West, Truss has lessons for the Conservative Party. They’re just not the ones she…
ByThe party could save up to £130bn by abandoning the Bank of England’s reckless quantitative tightening.
ByWhy would a Tory Treasury encourage passengers by making services better, when it could save money instead?
ByThe outsourced contract for the Treasury’s public enquiries system has been cancelled after just six months.
ByJeremy Hunt may claim Britain has a bright, innovative future, but his Treasury cares only about getting things on the…
ByAnd what about young people facing declining living standards?
ByLax banking regulation has cast a long shadow across the Square Mile.
ByA new history of the department shows that, as Liz Truss discovered to her cost, its “abacus economics” has never…
ByIf officials become unwilling to confront ministers with inconvenient truths, worse decisions will be made.
ByFaced with fascism in the 1930s, Labour developed a distinct, progressive agenda on defence. It must do the same against…
ByAnother short-term, last-minute deal will do little to resolve London's key transport issues.
ByRather than echoing the Tory promise of kickstarting growth, Labour needs to articulate a new politics of redistribution, focused on…
ByThe Bounce Back Loan Scheme was supposed to help small businesses stay afloat during Covid-19, but its rules meant fraud…
ByThe cost of bringing back the furlough scheme would be lower than failing to do so, say economists and business…
ByThe longest-serving Treasury chief in 80 years on Rishi Sunak, austerity and the decade to come.
ByBoris Johnson’s “levelling-up” plans for the north are being stalled once again by a department determined not to spend money.
By