Rachel Reeves’ Spending Review headache
When do “efficiency savings” become cuts?
ByNew Times,
New Thinking.
When do “efficiency savings” become cuts?
ByThe Chancellor aims to argue that her tough economic medicine has worked.
ByThe Chancellor is pushing through bold and inventive reforms but the wider picture for Britain’s economy is far from rosy.
ByHealth needs that aren’t met in primary care simply turn up in secondary care.
ByBond traders’ response to the Budget will act as a future constraint on higher public spending.
ByWere Labour's tax rises planned all along, or did the Tories force its hand?
ByPoor economic growth could force Rachel Reeves to choose between cuts and more tax rises.
ByHaving raised taxes and spending, Labour must now deliver improved services.
ByThe Chancellor’s £40bn tax rises have thrown down a challenge to business.
ByThe biggest revenue-raising item in the Budget will be paid for by employees.
ByThe Chancellor will use her Budget to tax and borrow far more than originally planned.
ByThe row over the £3 fare cap is telling of Labour’s comms struggles.
ByThe IFS director on Rachel Reeves’s first Budget and why he’s standing down next year.
ByThe Labour Party have swallowed the Iron Lady myth. Rachel Reeves must abandon it for good.
ByThe New Statesman had exclusive access to a focus group in one of Britain’s most deprived constituencies.
ByIt might take ten years and a lot of shouting, but that doesn’t mean it isn’t worth doing.
ByThe Starmer team knows it cannot succeed by offering voters no short-term improvements.
ByWrite to letters@newstatesman.co.uk to have your thoughts voiced in the New Statesman magazine.
ByRachel Reeves is the latest chancellor to lean on a tired cliché.
ByThe Budget will seek to define Britain’s past – and its future.
By