
Labour’s tax illusion
The world has changed, and policy must change with it.
ByNew Times,
New Thinking.
The world has changed, and policy must change with it.
ByThe Chancellor doesn’t see Germany’s “war Keynesianism” as a model to emulate.
ByThe question Labour needs a better answer to.
ByThe Chancellor now understands that the politics of her role are as important as the economics.
ByWhen do “efficiency savings” become cuts?
ByThe Budget proved it – the Treasury can’t be trusted to reverse the inequality of poorer regions with London.
ByHealth needs that aren’t met in primary care simply turn up in secondary care.
ByBond traders’ response to the Budget will act as a future constraint on higher public spending.
ByLifting the fare cap was better politics than it was policy.
ByWere Labour's tax rises planned all along, or did the Tories force its hand?
ByThe SNP can no longer claim that little divides Keir Starmer’s government from the Conservatives.
ByPoor economic growth could force Rachel Reeves to choose between cuts and more tax rises.
ByRachel Reeves is increasing taxes, investment and regulation in pursuit of a different economic model.
ByIn his last Commons performance, the former prime minister showed a new side to himself.
ByHaving raised taxes and spending, Labour must now deliver improved services.
ByThe Chancellor’s £40bn tax rises have thrown down a challenge to business.
ByThe biggest revenue-raising item in the Budget will be paid for by employees.
ByThe Chancellor will use her Budget to tax and borrow far more than originally planned.
ByThe row over the £3 fare cap is telling of Labour’s comms struggles.
ByThe manifesto promise on leasehold reform must not be broken.
By