New Times,
New Thinking.

  1. Spotlight on Policy
  2. Economic Growth
  3. Investment
9 December 2020updated 09 Sep 2021 11:30am

Reliability is the investment world’s most attractive attribute

The collapse in interest rates on bonds has forced investors to rethink their strategies. 

By Ben Lofthouse

For portfolio managers and investors alike, 2020 is likely to have been as turbulent a year as most in the asset management world have ever experienced. While the effects of the Covid-19 pandemic have been felt ubiquitously across global markets, income-seekers have suffered particularly severely as a consequence of recent corporate dividend-cutting and suspensions. Non-financial considerations have widely impacted dividend decisions, which have served only to accentuate an already challenging climate of record-low interest rates and collapsing government bond yields.

This unique investing environment has mandated a large degree of fresh thinking, and inevitably, UK investors – seeing their traditional sources of income, such as bank deposits and gilts, undermined – have sought alternatives in equity income funds. Unsurprisingly, attention has settled on investment trusts due to their ability to support dividend payouts with revenue reserves and, since 2012, to pay income out of capital, subject to shareholders’ approval. 

Henderson International Income Trust, part of the Janus Henderson stable of investment trusts, is specifically designed as a complementary diversifier for UK income-driven investors by providing a high and rising level of dividends, as well as capital appreciation, over the long term from a focused and internationally diversified portfolio of securities outside the UK.

The ex-UK aspect of the portfolio was designed to allow investors to be confident of true stock-specific diversification given that many global income funds often place too heavy a reliance on the FTSE 100 dividend payers and, as shown in the chart below, the dividends paid by UK companies (represented here by the FTSE 100 Index) are highly reliant on a small number of companies – not the case for Henderson International Income1

Select and enter your email address Your weekly guide to the best writing on ideas, politics, books and culture every Saturday. The best way to sign up for The Saturday Read is via saturdayread.substack.com The New Statesman's quick and essential guide to the news and politics of the day. The best way to sign up for Morning Call is via morningcall.substack.com
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how Progressive Media Investments may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
THANK YOU

Source: Janus Henderson Global Dividend Index, Link Group UK Dividend Monitor, for the year to 31 December, 2019; Henderson International Income dividend contribution for the one-year period to 31 August, 2020 

The trust is managed by me, Ben Lofthouse, head of global equity income at Janus Henderson, but it is in a position also to leverage the wealth of additional equity income experience within the Janus Henderson portfolio management team. Its current yield of over 4.1 per cent per annum2, coupled with the fact that dividends are paid quarterly (in February, May, August and November), makes it an attractive option for the income-seeking investor. Indeed, the trust has established a track record of rising income delivery and strong total-return performance. Since its launch in March 2011: 

• The dividend has grown from 1p per quarter to 1.5p per quarter3.

• The capital value has grown from 100p to 153.5p.

• Dividends have grown every financial year at a greater rate than inflation.

While dividend cuts were clearly a headline phenomenon in 2020, the impact varied significantly across both regions and sectors, and the benefits of the trust’s international diversification were brought sharply into focus by virtue of its ability proactively to adjust the portfolio to ensure that the majority of holdings increased or maintained their dividends: of the top ten holdings, nine increased their dividends, while one maintained its payout, highlighting the fact that not all companies have been impacted in the same way by the pandemic. 

While the majority of the trust’s holdings paid their dividends, some have delayed payments until the impact of the pandemic is clearer. Due to the fact that the trust has retained some of its income over the past few years, and in recognition of the importance of dividend income to shareholders, it is unsurprising that the trust’s board has deemed it appropriate to utilise a relatively moderate amount of the income reserves – earnings having been retained every year since launch for a “rainy day” – in supporting dividend payments: £917,000 of the £8,081,000 accrued at the start of the financial year was deployed to deliver a total dividend increase from 5.7p to 6p per ordinary share for the year to 31 August, 2020.

Returning to the central theme of dividend reliability, equity income investors will be abundantly aware that the key attraction of vehicles that invest with that objective in mind is that they deliver two components of return: capital and income. Often the two are viewed as one, a commonplace error driven by the fact that the capital volatility masks the income stability. Take the UK market, as represented by the FTSE All-Share and FTSE 100 indices: in the 30 years since 1989, they both returned a discrete capital gain in 20 of those years, whereas they both, of course, had positive-income returns in 100 per cent of the years.

Put simply, while there may not have been capital gains in any year, an income was always paid. For many investors – those using the trust to generate an income in retirement, for example – the lack of any pressing need to sell renders any short-term fluctuations in capital value largely irrelevant. 

The typical answer provided by most wealth managers when asked to construct a long-term investment portfolio would be largely based on Modern Portfolio Theory, as devised by the Nobel Prize-winning economist Harry Markowitz. The essence of the theory is that there is no gain to be had in investment without risk but that the risk can be contained within limits set by the investor via appropriate asset diversification.

In its simplest form, the gains, and therefore the risks, come from equities, while the containment, and traditionally the main source of income, is provided by bonds. In the past, therefore, the industry’s answer to providing a low-risk secure income, such as that required by a retired person, was often a portfolio of high-quality bonds. For many years, such a portfolio could be relied on to provide a “natural” income from interest receipts that kept pace with or exceeded inflation. 

Things have changed. For better or worse, the collapse in interest rates has compelled investors to revisit their assumptions and diluted the attractions of high-quality bonds. Inflation has also fallen in recent years, but not enough to offset the fall in interest rates. Equity income has come into its own. The appeal of equity vehicles as a reliable income generator is illustrated well by a seminal research piece conducted relatively recently by data provider Morningstar4

The chart below is an extract from the research, and in the context of a hypothetical retiree, it shows the probability of success of meeting withdrawals at various predetermined rates (made up of income and capital where necessary) over a 30-year period using different equity allocations – ranging from 0 per cent to 80 per cent – within the portfolio. “Success” is defined as withdrawals being sustained throughout the 30-year period, without the value of the portfolio being exhausted.   

Source: Morningstar, Safe Withdrawal Rates for Retirees in the United Kingdom, 1 May, 2016 

Traditionally, the 0 per cent equity portfolio would have been seen as the least risky and the 80 per cent equity-heavy portfolio the higher risk – and yet this is not borne out by the results. It is striking that in every withdrawal rate scenario shown, the highest equity allocation displays the least risk of the fund being depleted: in other words, the least risk to long-term income. 

These are challenging times for the world. There is no modern precedent for a pandemic such as this one, but Henderson International Income is well equipped to weather periods of economic uncertainty and to take advantage of opportunities as they arise. UK interest rates are likely to remain at, or close to, current lows, and against this backdrop, the objective of delivering an appealing income from an internationally diversified portfolio of holdings remains highly relevant. The trust will therefore continue with its existing strategy of identifying companies that are attractively valued, pay a sustainable dividend and have the capacity to grow their dividends over the medium to long term. 

For more information, click here.

Ben Lofthouse is head of global equity income at Janus Henderson Investors.

These are the views of the author at the time of publication and may differ from the views of other individuals/teams at Janus Henderson Investors. Any securities, funds, sectors and indices mentioned within this article do not constitute or form part of any offer or solicitation to buy or sell them.     

Past performance is not a guide to future performance. The value of an investment and the income from it can fall as well as rise, and you may not get back the amount originally invested. The information in this article does not qualify as an investment recommendation. 

1Source: Janus Henderson Global Dividend Index, Link Group UK Dividend Monitor, for the year to 31.12.19; Henderson International Income dividend contribution for the one-year period to 31.08.20

2As at 17.11.20

3Source: Henderson International Income Trust plc, Annual Report 2020, as at 31.08.20

4Morningstar, Safe Withdrawal Rates For Retirees In The United Kingdom, 01.05.16

Cick here for a glossary of terms.

Content from our partners
The Circular Economy: Green growth, jobs and resilience
Water security: is it a government priority?
Defend, deter, protect: the critical capabilities we rely on