New Times,
New Thinking.

  1. The Staggers
25 July 2022

What does it mean for the UK to host the Eurovision Song Contest?

It is a bittersweet decision that next year’s competition will not be held in Ukraine, but if you have the chance to buy tickets, take it.

By Adrian Bradley

This article was originally published on 17 June 2022. It has been updated in light of the confirmation that the UK will host Eurovision.

Eurovision 2023 will be held in the UK, the European Broadcasting Union (EBU) confirmed today.

Ukraine’s victory in the 2022 contest in Turin last month inevitably prompted discussions about whether the country could realistically host the contest, given its war with Russia It was decided on 17 June that it just would not be feasible or safe to do so and has today been confirmed that the UK will host. Given that the UK came second and the BBC is very well practised in running big international events, Britain was always seen as the likely stand-in.

While there is a flurry of excitement that the UK will host the contest next year, taking it away from Ukraine is a bittersweet decision. Kyiv successfully hosted the contest in 2017 (albeit with a lot of help from Swedish broadcaster SVT), and winning and hosting Eurovision was important to many Ukrainians. Even though the show will be hosted outside of Ukraine it should still be a Ukrainian show – they should get their flag in the Eurovision heart logo, and the postcards between every act should showcase the country. I am sure that the BBC understands the responsibilities that would come with hosting in these circumstances.

For the UK, which had struggled in the contest for decades until Sam Ryder’s performance in Turin, there’s something strange about getting to host by default; the job of restoring our Eurovision reputation is really only half done.

[ See also: Download the brand new NS App ]

There’s no doubting, though, that the BBC will do a very good job. It has stood in before when a winning country was unable to host: Brighton 1974 gave us Abba, but the UK was only hosting because Luxembourg did not want to do it for a third time in a row. The recent Jubilee celebrations also showed how good the BBC is at putting on a spectacular event. The UK Eurovision fan-base is also huge; Eurovision was one of the most-watched TV events so far this year, so if the country does host then every show will sell out, and sell out fast.

Give a gift subscription to the New Statesman this Christmas from just £49

It is, however, an expensive event for the BBC to put on at a time when the broadcaster’s finances are under a lot of pressure. It is unclear what support the UK government (or, indeed, the Scottish government, as one Nicola Sturgeon has suggested) will offer to help the BBC take it on.

The first big decision would be where to host it. You need a large indoor arena (but not too large – stadiums are out) with room for a press centre, and a city with good transport links and plenty of hotel rooms. The early favourites are Glasgow and Manchester, but expect lots of cities to make their case over the coming weeks, and the costs of hotel rooms in the month of May 2023 to rocket.

Still, despite all the challenges, if you live in Britain this could be your best opportunity to experience the Eurovision Song Contest – an event quite unlike any other.

[See also: When Eurovision came to Liverpool]

Content from our partners
How to solve the teaching crisis
Pitching in to support grassroots football
Putting citizen experience at the heart of AI-driven public services

Topics in this article : , ,