
It is “impossible to square” some of the conclusions of the Commission on Race and Ethnic Disparities report with the evidence it considered, a source with close knowledge of the Commission tells the New Statesman, claiming the Commission made “selective use” of evidence in its findings.
The source, who wishes to remain anonymous, expresses concern that “a huge amount of motivated reasoning was going on as this evidence was being heard and interpreted” and that “inconvenient evidence” was dismissed.