New Times,
New Thinking.

  1. Politics
  2. Labour
24 July 2024

Why Keir Starmer punished the Labour rebels

The Prime Minister is trying to scare new MPs into becoming loyal supporters of the government.

By Freddie Hayward

Start the clock on a Labour U-turn over the two-child benefit cap. Few think the policy is good within the party, and yet retaining the cap is policy. Something will have to give.

For now, it is seven Labour MPs who rebelled on the King’s Speech last night in order to vote for an SNP amendment which would scrap the cap. The group, which is on the party’s left and includes former shadow chancellor John McDonnell, were swiftly suspended. It’s like when Boris Johnson removed the whip from 21 liberal conservatives in 2019, except this time it’s over a policy the senior ministers have said is bad (Angela Rayner has called the cap “obscene”); it’s not a defining showdown which would shape the constitution for a generation.

This was drastic action. As the politics professor Philip Cowley pointed out, there is little precedent for removing the whip from those who rebel on the King’s Speech. So many suspensions so early on is designed to scare new MPs into disciplined, loyal supporters of the government’s policy. This is completely in line with the ruthless operation that Keir Starmer ran as leader of the opposition. Party democracy will never override what Starmer’s office judge as necessary to win. Don’t expect him to drop that approach because he now has a 160-seat majority.

There is something more revealing here than that Starmer has a tight grip on his party. The government say they cannot afford to remove the cap – in other words, they will not borrow, tax or move spending from elsewhere to fund the plan. The cost of doing so would be £2.5bn to £3.6bn, but Labour is emphatically not making the argument that fewer children in poverty would alleviate pressure on public services, create a healthier population and therefore boost economic growth. Instead, fiscal restraint in the short term is preferred over “invest to save”.

How will this end? The government is currently pinning national ruin on the Tories. But there will come a moment where Starmer will want to get his MPs onside and when Rachel Reeves will claim the “plan is working” and therefore the government can do what Starmer calls those “Labour things”. Until then, he will hope the punishment has worked.

Select and enter your email address Your weekly guide to the best writing on ideas, politics, books and culture every Saturday. The best way to sign up for The Saturday Read is via saturdayread.substack.com The New Statesman's quick and essential guide to the news and politics of the day. The best way to sign up for Morning Call is via morningcall.substack.com
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how Progressive Media Investments may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
THANK YOU

Content from our partners
Water security: is it a government priority?
Defend, deter, protect: the critical capabilities we rely on
The death - and rebirth - of public sector consultancy

Topics in this article : ,