First Thoughts: The New York Times debacle, and why the NHS has been overwhelmed
The paper was right to publish an article by the Republican senator Tom Cotton, but journalism is now so partisan I might be the only leftist on the planet who holds such views.
The New York Times Building is seen on February 26, 2017 in New York.
The White House denied access Frebuary 24. 2017 to an off-camera briefing to several major US media outlets, including CNN and The New York Times. Smaller outlets that have provided favorable coverage however were allowed to attend the briefing by spokesman Sean Spicer. The WHCA said it was "protesting strongly" against the decision to selectively deny media access. The New York Times said the decision was "an unmistakable insult to democratic ideals," CNN called it "an unacceptable development," and The Los Angeles Times warned the incident had "ratcheted up the White House's war on the free press" to a new level.
/ AFP / KENA BETANCUR (Photo credit should read KENA BETANCUR/AFP via Getty Images)
The New York Times (NYT) was right to publish an article by Tom Cotton, a Republican senator, which demanded “an overwhelming show of force” to put down riots in the wake of George Floyd’s murder. It was wrong, after protests from readers and journalists, to apologise and describe the essay as “short of the thoughtful approach that advances useful debate”. And though the opinion editor James Bennet should have certainly read his pages before publication – he didn’t on this occasion – it is deplorable that he was forced to resign.
Quite possibly, I am the only leftist on the planet who holds such views. Journalism has become so partisan, and its readers so embedded in their ideological silos, that almost nobody understands the concept of publishing a paper that offers a wide range of opinion.
Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month