New Times,
New Thinking.

  1. Politics
  2. Elections
16 April 2010

Election 2010: Party promises | Health – the King’s Fund’s verdict

All three parties aspire to local accountability

By Ruth Thorlby

Voters say that health is an election priority – second only to the economy in some polls. But whether the parties’ manifesto pledges on the NHS will influence people’s decisions in the polling booth is another matter. In part, this is due to the high level of consensus between the three main parties on the key NHS policies. In some places their manifestos are almost indistinguishable.

All the parties are committed to a tax-funded NHS, free at the point of use – not a surprising position for either Labour or the Liberal Democrats, but the Conservatives‘ conversion to this particular canon of public sector piety is more recent. In their 2005 manifesto, they promoted a policy to use NHS funds to subsidise the bills of patients paying for private sector treatment, to bring waiting lists down. But this was ditched soon afterwards and David Cameron’s commitment to the current NHS funding system has been unwavering since 2006, notwithstanding mutterings amongst some Conservative backbenchers about the need to discuss alternative funding options in the future.

Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month
Content from our partners
More than a landlord: A future of opportunity
Towards an NHS fit for the future
How drones can revolutionise UK public services