New Times,
New Thinking.

  1. Politics
  2. Brexit
8 February 2019updated 24 Jul 2021 5:51am

Why Labour is dangerously foolish to turn against freedom of movement

The Labour leadership champions “internationalism in one country” – but hardening borders won’t benefit workers. 

By David Adler

The most popular explanation for Labour’s decision to abstain and then U-turn on the government’s immigration bill last week – a bill that ends freedom of movement in the European Union, enshrines privileges for high-earning migrants against low-earning ones, and forces all EU citizens to apply for “settled status” – is simple electoral strategy.

If Labour hopes to court Leave voters, the argument goes, it must heed their call to constrain migration. Such was the logic of their 2017 manifesto promise that “freedom of movement will end” after Brexit.

Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month
Content from our partners
More than a landlord: A future of opportunity
Towards an NHS fit for the future
How drones can revolutionise UK public services