New Times,
New Thinking.

  1. Politics
6 July 2016updated 09 Sep 2021 11:28am

There’s a democratic case for a second referendum – this is how it can be done

The referendum did not ask the public whether they would choose any concrete alternative over staying in the EU.

By Belinda McRae and Andrew Lodder

In January 2013, David Cameron committed the Conservative Party to an “in-out” referendum on Europe, a promise that was duly incorporated in the party’s manifesto for the 2015 Election and delivered in the European Union Referendum Act 2015.  The Act passed the Commons with 544 votes to 53 in favour (only the Scottish National Party opposed it).  Parliament had thus determined that Britain’s constitutional settlement with Europe was a question on which it wished to be advised by the British public in a referendum (the outcome is advisory, not legally binding).

The advice the British public – at least the 37 per cent of eligible voters that opted to leave the European Union – gave Parliament on 23 June 2016 was clear.  The political establishment has, for the most part, accepted that it ought to be acted upon. As Theresa May, the leading contender to replace Mr Cameron, put it when opening her leadership campaign: “Brexit means Brexit.”  But, as more than a few Britons were furiously googling the day after the referendum, what exactly does “Brexit” mean?  

Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month
Content from our partners
How drones can revolutionise UK public services
Chelsea Valentine Q&A: “Embrace the learning process and develop your skills”
Apprenticeships: the road to prosperity