New Times,
New Thinking.

  1. Politics
27 May 2015

Labour needs as broad a debate as possible, not just a narrow fight between two and three names

Labour need to have a big broad debate in order to avoid another defeat in 2020.

By Chi Onwurah

A friend recently took up a top role with a major international tech company.  She had ten interviews and the head-hunter who recruited her said he had spent over a year putting forward over 80 candidates before she got the job; the company preferring to leave the role vacant rather than recruit the wrong person.

I thought of her as local members tweeted me to demand that #harriethangon and delay the leadership race. I don’t know whether it is or should be possible to delay the contest, and I am not proposing we consider eighty candidates. But Labour party members and supporters – and MPs – should have the opportunity to test more than two or three for both the leadership and the deputy leadership of our party. Or put it another way, I am not sure it is necessary to go long, but I am absolutely sure it is necessary to go broad.

Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month
Content from our partners
More than a landlord: A future of opportunity
Towards an NHS fit for the future
How drones can revolutionise UK public services