New Times,
New Thinking.

  1. Spotlight on Policy
  2. Elections
8 May 2010updated 27 Sep 2015 2:21am

The three-step case against first-past-the-post.

Our voting system is blatantly unfair.

By Jon Bernstein

Nothing better demonstrates the unfairness of our electoral system than these three charts, all based on the results of the 6 May election:

1. Share of the vote

 

2. Share of seats

3. Votes per seat

Select and enter your email address Your weekly guide to the best writing on ideas, politics, books and culture every Saturday. The best way to sign up for The Saturday Read is via saturdayread.substack.com The New Statesman's quick and essential guide to the news and politics of the day. The best way to sign up for Morning Call is via morningcall.substack.com
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how Progressive Media Investments may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
THANK YOU

It should be noted that things are not as bad as they once were. As John Cleese reminds us (courtesy of this archive clip), when the Social Democratic Party/Liberal alliance got 26 per cent of the vote in 1983, in effect, 340,000 votes were required to elect the MP for each of the 23 seats the alliance won.

To put that last chart another way:

Seats won per 100,000 votes

  • Conservative 2.8
  • Labour 3.0
  • Liberal Democrat 0.8

 

Content from our partners
The Circular Economy: Green growth, jobs and resilience
Water security: is it a government priority?
Defend, deter, protect: the critical capabilities we rely on