New Times,
New Thinking.

  1. World
16 September 2020updated 05 Aug 2021 9:12am

Masks are rare in Stockholm as residents debate the pros and cons of its non-lockdown

In Sweden, one of Europe's worst-hit countries, some are furious at the decision not to lock down – but many others are pleased to have been spared draconian measures.

By James Savage

As I walk around Stockholm, there is little sign that the Swedish capital was one of the worst-hit cities in Europe in an ongoing pandemic: restaurant tables are spaced a little further apart, and visiting the Royal Palace is an unusually relaxing experience in the absence of foreign tourists. There are markings on the floor at supermarket checkouts, and perspex screens in some taxis, but otherwise life continues as normal.

Masks are notably absent. Sweden’s unflappable chief epidemiologist Anders Tegnell has said he is unconvinced by the evidence for masks and is not even recommending them, let alone urging legislation to make them compulsory. Instead, he says, Swedes should avoid situations where they get too close to other people.

Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month
Content from our partners
An old Rioja, a simple Claret,and a Burgundy far too nice to put in risotto
Antimicrobial Resistance: Why urgent action is needed
The role and purpose of social housing continues to evolve