New Times,
New Thinking.

Muso snobs don’t own Kate Bush

Hoary gatekeepers mocking teenagers for finding “Running Up That Hill” through Stranger Things forget this is how it’s always worked.

By Marc Burrows

Middle-aged music fans loving Kate Bush is basically a given. Like Bowie, Pink Floyd, the Pet Shop Boys or Blur, the eccentric, eclectic Bush has entered a kind of muso-canon of beautified, untouchable artists. Anyone who saw the hysterical reactions to her 2014 residency at the Hammersmith Apollo will understand. And it’s justified, too. Kate Bush is a once in a generation pop star. She’s special. She’s earned her place. Her back catalogue is incredible and her influence is far reaching. No arguments here.

There is, of course, a problem. A canonised musician stops being a pop star and becomes a sort of totem of art and integrity. They become sainted. In a sense they stop being the very thing that made them exciting in the first place – a pop star. They can become the property of the worst kind of muso snob. Or at least that’s what the muso snobs think.

Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month
Content from our partners
An old Rioja, a simple Claret,and a Burgundy far too nice to put in risotto
Antimicrobial Resistance: Why urgent action is needed
The role and purpose of social housing continues to evolve
Topics in this article : , ,