New Times,
New Thinking.

  1. Business
  2. Economics
25 June 2013

Why Labour should be wary of attacking Osborne over borrowing

By repeatedly criticising the Chancellor for missing his deficit targets, the party risks reinforcing the impression that borrowing is always an economic ill.

By George Eaton

George Osborne is fond of boasting that the deficit has fallen “each and every year” under the coalition, so it was unfortunate for the Chancellor when revisions made by the ONS last week meant that borrowing was officially higher in 2012-13 (£118.8bn) than in 2011-12 (£118.5bn).

At today’s Treasury questions, Ed Balls and the rest of Labour’s hit squad repeatedly attempted to force the Chancellor to concede as much, but Osborne gave no ground. He (correctly) pointed out that borrowing was only higher last year (2012-13) because the ONS had revised the 2011-12 figure down (by £2.4bn), “which was actually good news”, and that, in GDP terms, the deficit fell from 7.8 per cent to 7.7 per cent. Along the way, the vampiric Osborne suggested that taking lessons from Balls on how to balance the books was like “getting a lesson from Dracula on how to look after a blood bank”. 

Content from our partners
Collaboration is key to ignition
Common Goals
Securing our national assets
Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month