New Times,
New Thinking.

  1. Politics
14 July 2016updated 15 Jul 2016 9:06am

The Department of Energy and Climate Change has been scrapped – how scared should we be?

In a major departmental change, the government has axed DECC and folded the brief into a new, expanded Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy.

By India Bourke

Climate change has disappeared! Not from the atmosphere sadly. But from inclusion in the title of a UK government department. The new PM, Theresa May, has merged the old Department of Energy and Climate Change with elements of the Department for Business. The result: a new Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy.

So what does this sudden ommission mean for the green agenda? Will carbon reduction now be central to business investment – so accepted that it no longer needs spelling out? Or rather consigned to an awkward afterthought?

The first reactions to the news of DECC’s dismantling were distinctly frosty:

But the announcement that Greg Clark, MP for Tunbridge Wells, would be taking the helm of the new department has helped calm some of the initial fear. Clark has been praised by the green sector, both as Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, and during his time as shadow environment secretary.

Select and enter your email address Your weekly guide to the best writing on ideas, politics, books and culture every Saturday. The best way to sign up for The Saturday Read is via saturdayread.substack.com The New Statesman's quick and essential guide to the news and politics of the day. The best way to sign up for Morning Call is via morningcall.substack.com
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how Progressive Media Investments may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
THANK YOU

He is particularly feted for arguing that action on climate change can be the path to a stronger economy, rather than an obstacle. “The choice between aggressive and ambitious action on carbon reduction and a successful, powerful economy is, in fact, not a choice at all – they are one and the same,” he said of Labour’s 2010 decision to raise emmissions targets 

And his statement this afternoon said nothing to suggest that he has changed his position:

“I am thrilled to have been appointed to lead this new department charged with delivering a comprehensive industrial strategy, leading Government’s relationship with business, furthering our world-class science base, delivering affordable, clean energy and tackling climate change.” 

Though many will be hoping that the order of his sentence does not reflect his hierarchy of care:

Clark will have to act swiftly to reassure environmentalists and investors alike. A quick ratification of the Paris Agreement would be an excellent start here. As would boosting renewable energy and making good on his 2010 ambitions to  support research into carbon capture storage and the roll out of smart grids.

Such signals will be all the more urgent in light of the appointments of Andrea Leadsom to DEFRA and Boris Johnson as Foreign Secretary – both figures renown for their links to the climate-sceptic side of the Conservative party. 

Clark is a smart appointment. But with climate change no longer enshrined in a department’s purpose, the green lobby is left pinning its hopes on a single man. 

Content from our partners
The Circular Economy: Green growth, jobs and resilience
Water security: is it a government priority?
Defend, deter, protect: the critical capabilities we rely on