New Times,
New Thinking.

  1. Spotlight on Policy
1 March 2019

John Prescott: “The Northern Powerhouse? It’s not bloody Northern! It stops on the Pennines!”

The former Deputy Prime Minister lambasts the government’s record in the North.

By Jonny Ball

“I won’t join in the Punch and Judy show but I’ll admit to being punched on devolution and the Northern Way for two decades.” Speaking at the New Statesman’s 2019 Northern Powerhouse conference in Leeds this week, which coincided with the launch of the latest Spotlight edition on the Northern Powerhouse, John Prescott bemoaned the missed opportunities and empty rhetoric which, he claimed, has been characteristic of the government’s policy approach in the North of England.

Echoing a common refrain from critics of the Powerhouse strategy, the former Deputy Prime Minister and Labour Life Peer highlighted the disproportionate focus of the Powerhouse project on the larger cities of the North West. “The Northern Powerhouse? It’s not bloody Northern! It stops on the Pennines!… They’re not going to give devolution to Yorkshire because it’ll probably produce a Labour mayor. They don’t want another Labour mayor, they’ve already got enough of them at this conference!”

Following on from opening speeches from Councillor Judith Blake, leader of Leeds City Council, and Jake Berry MP, Minister for the Northern Powerhouse and Local Growth, who claimed that a reboot of the Northern Powerhouse strategy was underway, Prescott lamented the cancelation of his own devolutionary strategy, the Northern Way, after the Conservatives came to power in 2010.

“I’m a convinced decentraliser, I’ve always believed in devolution. We gave devolution to Scotland, we gave it to Wales, and I actually gave it to London, thinking we’d start the argument of the English regions being entitled to similar resources and power to get on with the job. I want devolution to the English regions as much as in Scotland and Wales. That’s why I introduced the Northern Way concept two decades ago. The Northern Way did give more resources and powers, did develop a transport plan. [George] Osborne abolished it! And today he’s accusing the government of having no vision about the Powerhouse!”

The previous day, George Osborne had publicly criticised the government for its lack of vision on the Northern Powerhouse and for failing to advance the initiative.

Select and enter your email address Your weekly guide to the best writing on ideas, politics, books and culture every Saturday. The best way to sign up for The Saturday Read is via saturdayread.substack.com The New Statesman's quick and essential guide to the news and politics of the day. The best way to sign up for Morning Call is via morningcall.substack.com
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how Progressive Media Investments may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
THANK YOU

Having previously caused a stir after storming out of a Transport for the North event last year, describing it as “a bloody fraud”, Prescott used the opportunity at the conference to elaborate on the body’s inadequacies. He said: “The only thing Transport for the North can do is consult with Minister [Chris] Grayling. Bloody good luck with that! You’ll get a Punch and Judy show there but you’ll get no action… Not like the London one! They’ve got their own powers, their own resources, Crossrail, massive amounts of money. Not up here though! Here you’ve got to consult the Treasury.”

With the threat of climate change and the challenges of the fourth industrial revolution, Prescott called for closer collaboration and a unified approach across the whole region to advance the interests of the North as a successful engine for green, sustainable growth. He added: “Let’s have one Northern voice with one Northern plan facing a new industrial revolution.”

Content from our partners
The Circular Economy: Green growth, jobs and resilience
Water security: is it a government priority?
Defend, deter, protect: the critical capabilities we rely on