Registered user login:

Vote for Little Britain?

Simon Hooper

Published 09 July 2008

Simon Hooper visits Haltemprice and Howden where David Davis has forced a by-election on civil liberties. But how do voters worried about the economy feel at being part of a referendum?

It's not hard finding David Davis. There he is as I drive through Willerby, standing outside his campaign headquarters, taking advantage of a sunny break between the early morning Yorkshire showers to do his first television interview of the day.

A few minutes later, having warmly greeted the day's visiting Conservative bigwigs, former shadow cabinet colleagues George Osborne and Michael Gove, Davis can barely be restrained from his electorate any longer.

"Howden team this way!" he cries as he strides out of the door, sleeves already rolled up and displaying commendable eagerness for the frontine leafleting and door-stepping that is the main business of by-election canvassing.

This of course has been no ordinary by-election. Since Davis resigned from parliament and the Conservative front bench on 12 June to launch his one-man crusade for civil liberties, he has been both ridiculed as an eccentric political stuntman and feted as that rarest of beasts, a principled independent thinker uncowed by the Westminster spin machine.

With less than two days left of the campaign, both arguments still hold and neither the electorate here in Haltemprice and Howden nor the media seem able to make up their minds which David Davis they prefer.

In many ways, Davis has made his point already. Having attracted a broad spectrum of support from the likes of Tony Benn, Bob Geldof, Martin Bell, Bob Marshall-Andrews and Shami Chakrabarti – who have all ventured north in solidarity with his cause – Davis pretty much won the argument when Labour declined to stand a candidate against him over the issue of 42 days.

Catching up with him later in the day in Howden's picturesque market square, he concedes disappointment that Labour failed to rise to his challenge. "The Prime Minister tells us it's vital to national security and yet they won't defend it? It's pathetic and cowardly, both morally, intellectually and politically," Davis tells newstatesman.com.

But the big battle now, as Davis admits, is turnout – something which may well determine whether he returns to Westminster with his heavyweight reputation enhanced or eroded. This campaign has had the feel of an American primary with issues of national importance being discussed at a local level, something that Davis himself has encouraged. "They are being asked to speak for Britain. This is a referendum," he says.

Yet many on the street express bemusement and reluctance at their involuntary conscription as foot soldiers in the fight for civil liberties. Davis admits that some have not cared for the subtleties of the 42-day debate, equating "terrorist suspects" with "terrorists".

Some say they are more concerned by economic issues and express disapproval at the costs of an "unnecessary" by-election.

And others are just plain rude. "I don't care what he thinks or what he does," says a man in a Howden cafe. "I think he's a dickhead."

Davis' cause has not been aided either by the vapour trail of candidates running in his wake – a 25-strong list ranging from serious-minded opponents such as the Greens' Shan Oakes, the anti-rape campaigner Jill Saward and political reformers such as David Pinder of the New Party to Miss Great Britain, the Monster Raving Looney Party and the Church of the Militant Elvis Party.

Then there is David Icke, whose supporters accuse Davis of banning their candidate from public events and seem to have set out to ambush him wherever he goes. It is an event that has rendered a rich vein of British sature from Monty Python to the League of Gentlemen largely redundant, at times feeling less like a referendum for Britain than a referendum for Little Britain.

But former independent MP Martin Bell for one believes it is a process that has strengthened politics rather than trivialised it, describing the by-election as "a little festival of democracy."

"Anybody has a right, so long as they are a citizen of good standing, to stand for the House of Commons and I think it's admirable that 25 people should do so," Bell told newstatesman.com.

"I suppose what really drives me to come up here is that here is a man who puts his principles before his career and that is so unusual in politics. I accept the fact that people are probably more exercised about the price of petrol than they are about their civil liberties but civil liberties still matter. I think David will come out of this hugely strengthened as a politician."

Bell later takes the stage alongside Davis and filmmaker Chris Atkins at a well-attended village hall event in Eastrington. It is an idyllic summer's evening amid this rolling countyside with a gentle game of cricket forming an elegiac backdrop in the late evening light.

The last Englishman to fight a battle for Anglo-Saxon liberties over this terrain was King Harold, who defeated Harald Hardrada's Viking invaders not so far from here at the Battle of Stamford Bridge in 1066. Every good school boy and girl knows what happened next.

But David Davis insists he is gearing up for more battles ahead. "This by-election has lasted 10 days. We will be talking about these issues in 10 years," he tells his audience. But will those constituents turn out to back his cause on Thursday?

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

4 comments from readers

Carl Jones
09 July 2008 at 13:20

Simon; what do you mean in paragraph 6? "Both arguments still hold"...."which David Davis they prefer".LOL

Shortly before she stood down as head of MI5, Dame Eliza Mannigham-Buller gave a speech which was shocking in content and in my opinion was delivered in a mocking tone. DEMB said there were 2000 active terrorists, 20 terror cells...ect, she said this as a statement of fact (the mocking part), an evidenced based statement, yet these terrorists walk our streets freely.LOL

The police carryied out 1.6 million stop and searches, how many were terrorists?lol

DEMB has come out against 42 days as its unworkable.....what she really means is that MI5 will have its work cut out devising false flag terror plots which will use all 42 days.LOL LOL

The War on Terror is an MI6 construct to replace the Cold War. The CIA and Mossad are on board. The ignition event was 9/11, which the BBC has just made a truth avoidence programme called "Conspiracy Files"...since 9/11 the War on Terror front has been faught between Glasgow (LOL) and Pakistan and is mainly a MI6 operation. Another point to remember, is that it was MI6 who faked the "Niger Yellow Cake Report. Valerie Plame`s husband Joe Wison was asked to investigate....he returned a verdict which made the Neocons very unhappy and led to the exposure of deep-cover agent Valerie Plame (she is taking legal action against the criminals in the Whitehouse). But the Bush cabal`s lie stuck. In Britain we had the WMD dossier, this was another treasonous work of fiction....Britain awash with war criminals.LOL

You might ask, what does this have to do with 42 days? Well, here in Britain we have a culture of "all accused of terror, throw away the key". However, in the US, the public believes that Saddam and Iraq were directly involved in 9/11....great NWO pitch and with the BBC lying machine hard at work, you might ask "what hope does truth have? Well, at current rates, it is doubtful that Blair will get into his wooden box before the majority of Brits believe he`s a war criminal, in fact its likely that half already do. Just the other week ex BBC journalist Tony Gosling was arrested by the police on trumped up charges which were later dropped. Gosling had been in contact with a source who claimed that Mossad had terror cells in UK education establishments.....and before the NS censors me, this information is freely available on established websites such as bilderberg.org.

We are on the brink of another war. The US needs another war, it could be Iran, but there are options. For the NWO to pull this off, they will likely need another 9/11 false flag attack at best, at worst it will something more direct against Israel.

David Davis and Dame Eliza Mannigham-Buller are playing a risky game.....both are just "on-side". DD wants to remain onside, so its no wonder that DD fears David Icke the most, because both pitches make a very powerful argument against the NWO and its shame War on Terror (sorry Gordon).....Simon; is this what you ment by "which David Davis they prefer"?lol

fylfot
09 July 2008 at 13:26

"[DD had] sleeves already rolled up and displaying commendable eagerness for the frontine leafleting and door-stepping that is the main business of by-election canvassing"

You've clearly not spent much time in the constituency. David Davis has spent very little time speaking to constituents. He's been too busy speaking to celebrities, journalists, snubbing his rivals (he's not had a single debate with even the most serious of candidates like Shan Oakes), or he's been outside of the constituency "on business".

If David Davis truly cared what the people of Haltemprice and Howden thought he'd be listening, and he would realise that his most loyal supporters see this as publicity stunt, his critics are amazed that a man with his record is standing on civil liberties, and everyone else (the majority of people) just don't really care.

I wanted to believe in David Davis when he spoke of creating an opportunity for debate, but his actions during the campaign have revealed an astonishingly selfish arrogance. He's forgotten about the people he wants to represent and abandoned democracy on the assumption of a coronation on Friday.

anglicus
09 July 2008 at 14:01

Slightly off-topic. I attended a local school fete a couple of weeks ago and who should be there but our local MP the Rt.Hon.Humfrey Mallins. He gratuitously donated a tour of the House of Parliament as a raffle prize. He could have spent at least an hour talking to his constituents but like David Davis he has a totally safe seat, so why should he bother talking to the peasants. I'm afraid they are all tarred with the same brush.

Viscount Firm
09 July 2008 at 14:21

Perhaps Humpy didn't believe in fete.

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

Also by Simon Hooper

Read More

Vote!

Did you enjoy the Beijing Olympics?