Registered user login:

We can't drive away from global warming

Tony Bosworth

Published 16 April 2008

The mayoral candidates need to consider global warming when discussing the congestion and emission charges.

Car ads sell us a particularly seductive modern day fantasy. We are promised open roads cutting through sweeping panoramic landscapes, speed, freedom, and excitement.

But for those of us who find ourselves inching along in snarled up traffic, the lack of speed isn’t the only difference between the dream and the reality of modern day motoring. Road transport accounts for about a fifth of the UK’s carbon emissions – and research shows using greener cars could be the fastest way to slash this. Therefore moves by national and local government to encourage drivers to use smarter cars – such as the Mayor of London’s proposal to increase the congestion charge to £25 for gas-guzzlers - are welcome.

Ken Livingstone’s proposal has infuriated Porsche, which has launched a legal challenge against what it brands a ‘disproportionate’ measure. Of the 53 types of car that Porsche sells in the UK, 51 would pay the higher charge. In a document seen by the Daily Telegraph, the car manufacturer estimates its sales would fall by 11 per cent if the higher charge came in.

The London congestion charge isn’t the only climate-changing initiative that Porsche opposes. Along with the rest of the car industry, Porsche - which boasts of “protecting the environment to the highest degree” - is fighting new targets to reduce pollution from new vehicles by increasing their fuel efficiency. Could the bottom line be concentrating their minds?

Of course, if Ken doesn’t get elected as Mayor of London on 1 May then Porsche’s London legal challenge will vanish into thin air. Both Boris Johnson and Brian Paddick would drop the proposed gas-guzzler charge.

It’s telling, though, that neither of them would abolish the congestion charge in the original central London zone, pledging only to reopen consultation on the more recent extension into west London. Boris’s promise to look at introducing a flexible pricing system to target the worst congestion seems sensible – until you consider that many of the capital’s top congestion hot-spots are actually in outer London.

Brian Paddick’s plan to introduce a London-wide charge for all cars entering London from outside the city are certainly ambitious, but it would need top notch monitoring technology and drastic negotiations with train and bus operators to ensure the infrastructure is in place to shuttle a high volume of incomers into the capital and out again.

The Lib Dem and Tory candidates have also pledged to re-phase traffic lights to get traffic moving faster – a move which neither takes account of those of us trying to cross the road on foot nor tackles the central problem of the sheer volume of traffic on London’s roads.

The congestion charge is not perfect, but it’s a vital tool that, now it is in place, can be fine tuned and perfected in time. And it is crucial in sending the message to the rest of the world that global warming is not something any of us can simply drive away from in a cloud of dust.

Tony Bosworth is the transport campaigner for Friends of the Earth

To find out who you should be voting for on May 1st visit our Fantasy Mayor site.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

2 comments from readers

stander
16 April 2008 at 21:37

Tony, if climate change is the issue why not just increase fuel duty? everyone pays based on their actual usage, no need for £1BN collection mechanism which is just a waste of resources, no exploitation of a small community of londoners, so that local politicians can join the global stage by sending out "messages to the rest of the world". i appreciate the concerns of MMGW, but should we sacrifice concepts of fairness, equality and proportionality in the pursuit of political posturing? people who care about global warming should say NO to the emission charge, because it destroys goodwill, its a terrible cost/ benefit trade off for uk people, and smacks of an envy tax.

Sandy Franzen
03 May 2008 at 15:23

Congestion cCharge Manchester

I am disappointed that the local elections have been used by the major parties and the media as a mini general election. There has been little focus on local issues and the performance of councils and councillors. In Irlam and Cadishead (2 wards in Salford) the Community Action Party worked hard for the community and blasted Labour councillors for complacency and inactivity on local issues. As a result they won in Irlam defeating the Labour chair of the Greater Manchester passenger Transport Authority. He was a champion for bringing the congestion charge into the North west and a front man for Wigan Labour leader Lord Smith who lost 4 more seats in Wigan down 30 in just four years. That is about local politics sending a message to Whitehall. Could it be a start to the end of the congestion charge spreading beyond London due to the efforts of the Community Action Party? The local Tories and some Lib Dem councils are still sitting on the congestion charge fence in Greater Manchester, maybe now they can make a decision.

Ex Councillor Sandy Franzen Wigan

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

Read More

Vote!

Is this the worst economic situation for 60 years?