Return to: Home | Arts & Culture | Television

More questions than answers

Rachel Cooke

Published 11 December 2008

This prurient and trivial documentary was yet another missed opportunity
The Pregnant Man (Cutting Edge)
Channel 4

Thomas Beatie, who is now expecting a second baby

More questions than answers

Thomas Beatie, as all the world now surely knows, is a transgender man from Oregon who had the breasts he was born with surgically removed, but elected to keep his female reproductive organs. When his wife, Nancy, found that she could not have another child - she has two daughters from a previous relationship - he decided to leave off taking the testosterone for a while and get pregnant himself, using donor sperm. In June, he gave birth to a daughter, Susan.

Needless to say, when the news of his pregnancy broke, the media went wild and a now infamous photograph of Thomas, his swollen belly covered in soft, dark hair, quickly travelled across the world (the picture was taken by Nancy, to accompany an article Thomas wrote for the Advocate, in which he explored the legal questions surrounding his new status). The Beaties, who run a business printing T-shirts, reacted to this voracious and often unkindly press interest by appearing on Oprah, and by signing an exclusive deal with People magazine and the makers of this documentary. People would publish the first pictures of Susan, and a television crew would film the goings-on in the labour room, as a bearded man struggled and strained to bring a new life into the world.

Advance publicity for The Pregnant Man (11 December, 9pm) suggested that it would be far superior to the physiological freak shows one finds on some other channels. The word went out that the Cutting Edge film would not judge, nor would it point and stare. Rather, it would use Thomas Beatie's story as a way of looking at gender, at our preconceptions about the roles of the sexes.

To which I say: what utter baloney. I watched The Pregnant Man with a feeling of nausea, not from the Beaties' unusual arrangement - they appear to be decent, straightforward people, and more capable of bringing up a child than some conventional couples I can think of - but because of the film's tone.

It wasn't only because Thomas was so often filmed half-clad, flexing his muscles, the better that we might stare at his bizarre form (however liberal you are, there is no getting away from the fact that a pregnant man looks pretty odd). Nor was it because the director was so fixated with playing the hateful anti-Beatie video messages posted by anonymous bigots on the net.

No, what I really despised was the feeling that this - the birth of a child - was a just a caper. Laugh at the clod-hopping German TV reporter as he tries and fails to get access to the Beaties' neighbours! Smile as Craig Kelly, our chirpy northern narrator, builds the excitement! Why were Thomas and Nancy repeatedly interviewed in bed? Why were no expert witnesses - doctors, psychologists, social historians - ever called upon to put their story in context? And why, oh why, was the film's background music so jaunty? It sounded like leftovers from How Clean Is Your House?.

This unsettling combination of prurience and reductive triviality is an increasingly common feature of Channel 4 documentaries, and it drives me nuts. Apart from anything, it is just so frustrating to see genuinely interesting material - a real scoop - in the hands of people who apparently lost their sense of inquiry at the same time as they mislaid their sense of decency.

The Pregnant Man threw up plenty of questions, big and small, but it answered virtually none. "I kind of have a penis," said Thomas, grinning at an interrogator we could not see. Really? Do they just grow, like cress? We never found out. When Nancy was shown breastfeeding Susan, a disembodied voice asked what she'd done to stimulate her milk. She mumbled something confusing about "birth control" and "herbs", and the voice, presumably satisfied with this answer, did not pursue it.

I hear, via Barbara Walters, that Thomas is expecting another baby. I wonder: is there any hope that he might be induced to have this one in private? Pluck in the face of prejudice is always admirable. But it is also the case that some stories are best told by means of a life well led, and a job well done, rather than instantly, via television cameras and supermarket magazines. The time for telling is when Susan and her little brother or sister are grown, and safely despatched to college.

Pick of the week

River Cottage Christmas Special
17 December, 8pm, Channel 4
Hugh's festive table, starring flaming jam roly poly.

The Perfect House: the Life and Work of Palladio
17 December, 9pm, BBC4
Renaissance homes to die for.

Peter Kay's Britain's Got an Extra Pop Factor
19 December, 9pm, Channel 4
Kay's spoof talent-show winner, Geraldine McQueen, returns.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

12 comments from readers

GixxerKitten
11 December 2008 at 13:27

Talk about people wanting to have their cake and eat it too. The whole idea of a man, any man, giving birth is disturbing. Truth is, Thomas is not a man. She is a woman. Gender cannot be turned on with the flick of a light switch. Let's call a spade, a spade. Putting feathers on a cat, doesn't make it a chicken.

Carl Jones
11 December 2008 at 16:25

Hes not a "man", so the whole thing is a bit stupid. I know there is a huge grey area, where some people dont know where/what they are, but thats the nub...men know they are men. It is not in the nature of the male, to put themselves in such a vulnerable situation....

...when a man feels unwell, his body REALLY does shut down, he lies low, this is a SURVIVAL MECHANISM, so carrying a baby for 9 months is so counterintuitve, so its safe to say, "he" isnt a man.

Levi-baybee!
11 December 2008 at 21:43

he isnt a mann! he was a wmen nd he wants to be man! they isnt nothin rong wid tht! its his choice its is life not ours, people butt in like its there buisness but it isnt!

SO LEAVE HIM ALONE!

Paige
11 December 2008 at 22:09

He seems a lovely person, and there is nothing wrong with him having a baby. He will be like any other loving father. Just because he used to be a women doesn't make him any less of a man.

He's not done anything wrong to you? He's just living his normal life!

sumisun
11 December 2008 at 22:55

let him have peace man. its his life and dont you dare blame him again. hes nice gentlemen nd gnna be a great father wish him luck

Carl Jones
12 December 2008 at 11:20

levi-baybee!, if your comment was directed at me, then I should point out that the documentary and this article starts out with the premiss, that the subject is a "man"....he is not a man.

Paige, has taken this PROPAGANDA and now fully believes the subject is a "man". "There is nothing wrong with HIM having a baby". The subject has female reproductive organs....THE SUBJECT IS NOT A MAN. "He`s just living his NORMAL life"....sorry, lets forget about our stupic PC world, the subject is not leading a NORMAL life.

sumisun, you are another one, "let him have peace man"....the subject agreed to make the documentary!!! The subject doesn`t want "peace".LOL

I find it staggering that a MSM documentary and the Newstatesman, are engaged in what is a BLATANT lie....next you`ll be telling us this person will be running in London 2012 Olympics mens 100 metres final.LOL

wanderer
12 December 2008 at 17:50

Gross.

Carl Jones
12 December 2008 at 22:44

wanderer, please explain. :)

wanderer
13 December 2008 at 15:06

The 'situation' is the result of a series of irresponsible and selfish actions. Hubris. A grotesque situation. The most important person here is the child who is about to be born.

Poor, poor, child.

Carl Jones
13 December 2008 at 15:29

Thanks for getting back, and I agree, it is an ABOMINATION.

wanderer
15 December 2008 at 13:57

Thanks Carl. Channel4 appears to be without conscience in it's promoting of "the Society of the Spectacle" .

gismo
29 December 2008 at 23:30

I watched the documentary programme on tv this evening, and thought what a lovely family! This little girl will be brought up in a loving environment where is is welcomed and wanted. Good luck to the Beatie family, one and all!

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

You may enter up to 2000 characters (about 300-350 words)

Characters left:

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

About the writer

Rachel Cooke

Rachel Cooke trained as a reporter on The Sunday Times. She is now a writer at The Observer. In the 2006 British Press Awards, she was named Interviewer of the Year.

Read More

Vote!

Will China rule the world?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 – 2009

Tracker