New Times,
New Thinking.

  1. Culture
  2. Sport
10 September 2015updated 11 Sep 2015 9:22am

Managers will tell you “there’s no ‘I’ in team” – but any great team needs its lone drifters

In both sport and business, players with independent temperaments are often dragged into the middle ground, undermining their value.

By Ed Smith

A heresy will not leave me alone. It cuts against almost everything I have ever been told to believe about teams, sport, management and leadership. Yet the more I guiltily reflect on the idea, the truer it feels. My theme is very simple. Much of the effort that goes into management and team-building is not just fruitless, but detrimental. It is ­precisely when a team begins to think and feel “as one” that it becomes newly vulnerable. “There is no ‘I’ in team” is perhaps the best-known cliché in management. What if there shouldn’t be a “we”?

A team – any team – is more resilient when its mood is diversified. So the effort should be towards de-correlating individual performances. A team can survive one or two people being off colour. It is when everyone goes down together (case study: a batting collapse) that disaster strikes. The ever-expanding management class, however, by constantly trying to bind colleagues into a unit, accidentally increases the risks facing the team.

Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month
Content from our partners
Antimicrobial Resistance: Why urgent action is needed
The role and purpose of social housing continues to evolve
More than a landlord: A future of opportunity