New Times,
New Thinking.

  1. Spotlight on Policy
  2. Elections
21 January 2015updated 27 Jan 2015 9:26am

Labour and the Tories aren’t the same – so why do voters still think they are?

The ideological differences between the parties are greater than for decades. But their shared culture means few have noticed. 

By George Eaton

There is one point on which Ukip, the SNP and the Green Party agree: the problem with Labour and the Conservatives is how alike they are. All three deploy the hackneyed charge that not a “cigarette paper” would pass between them.

At times in British politics this claim has appeared plausible. Around 2006 and 2007, the ideological terrain on which Labour and the Tories fought was microscopically small. For fear of being viewed as anti-business, the former would not propose tax rises on the wealthy. For fear of being viewed as anti-state, the latter would not propose cuts in public spending (agreeing in September 2007 to match Labour’s expenditure levels for three years). The portmanteau “Blameronism” was coined to describe the banal consensus between the two parties, just as “Butskellism” stood for that of the postwar era. It felt as if politics had been reduced to a contest between rival management teams, rather than a clash of ideologies. 

Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month
  • Now listen to George Eaton discuss the difference between Labour and the Tories on the NS podcast:
Content from our partners
More than a landlord: A future of opportunity
Towards an NHS fit for the future
How drones can revolutionise UK public services