New Times,
New Thinking.

  1. Politics
29 July 2014

Why the Sun’s “boy with the devil mark” front page should make you uneasy

A child with a peculiarly-shaped mark on his body has been given national exposure by the Sun.

By Media Mole

The Sun has a strange front page today boasting that a four-year-old boy has the “mark of [the] devil” on his torso:

(We’ve blurred the boy’s face, and the text. The story’s elsewhere if you want to read it.)

While the Sun‘s editorial team are probably filing this under the same kooky category as “Jesus in a sarnie“, is that how it comes across?

Let’s accept there is no such thing as the devil, so what is the mark? It looks superficially like something hot and round being pressed against a child’s skin – a hairdryer, or maybe a stove top – although you’d hope the Sun would have excluded that possibility. (It could also be a birthmark, but according to the story it had already faded by mid-June – presumably, the paper has been sitting on this story until a slow news day came around.)

Select and enter your email address Your weekly guide to the best writing on ideas, politics, books and culture every Saturday. The best way to sign up for The Saturday Read is via saturdayread.substack.com The New Statesman's quick and essential guide to the news and politics of the day. The best way to sign up for Morning Call is via morningcall.substack.com
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how Progressive Media Investments may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
THANK YOU

Secondly, fear of satanic possession was one of the motivations for the abusers of Victoria Climbié. Should we really be encouraging the idea that children can have devil’s marks, even as a silly season joke?

UPDATE: The Sun has responded to the Guardian about the story:

A spokesman for the Sun said: “This was a story provided by the parents, who had already publicised the pictures and story on Facebook. We sought to treat it in a lighthearted fashion, highlighting the apparently fanciful link to the occult.

“We are conscious of the code and guidance around paying parents. We did not encourage the parents to embellish or expand the story; it came to us, and had already been the subject of discussion (raised by the parents) on social media.

“It’s also worth noting that no concerns were expressed about the child’s welfare. An unusual mark appears, the mother gets it checked out by a doctor who confirms there is no medical reason why it should be there, and discharges her. Social workers are not involved.”

Content from our partners
No health, no growth
Tackling cancer waiting times
Kickstarting growth: will complex health issues be ignored?