New Times,
New Thinking.

  1. Politics
4 June 2013

Equal marriage could only threaten gender roles if it magically turned everyone gay

The modern basis of marriage is partnership and equality rather than innate difference.

By Nelson Jones

One of the favourite arguments of those opposed to same-sex marriage is the idea that the institution of marriage embodies the “complementary” nature of men and women. Just as (they would say) marriage and civil partnership are “equal but different”, so are the genders. The fact that the argument invariably comes from those espousing what they like to call the “Biblical” view of marriage (conveniently skirting over all those polygamous patriarchs in the Old Testament, but never mind) is apt to raise suspicions that what they really mean is that women belong at home in the kitchen while their husbands are out winning the bread in appropriately manly ways. But I doubt it’s necessarily as reactionary as that, at least not in the minds of many of those putting it forward – liberal Anglican bishops, for example.

Speaking yesterday in the House of Lords, the Bishop of Leicester offered a superficially convincing modern twist on the idea. 

Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month
Content from our partners
Common Goals
Securing our national assets
A mission for a better country and economy