New Times,
New Thinking.

  1. Spotlight on Policy
  2. Elections
8 May 2010updated 27 Sep 2015 2:21am

The three-step case against first-past-the-post.

Our voting system is blatantly unfair.

By Jon Bernstein

Nothing better demonstrates the unfairness of our electoral system than these three charts, all based on the results of the 6 May election:

1. Share of the vote

 

2. Share of seats

3. Votes per seat

It should be noted that things are not as bad as they once were. As John Cleese reminds us (courtesy of this archive clip), when the Social Democratic Party/Liberal alliance got 26 per cent of the vote in 1983, in effect, 340,000 votes were required to elect the MP for each of the 23 seats the alliance won.

To put that last chart another way:

Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month

Seats won per 100,000 votes

  • Conservative 2.8
  • Labour 3.0
  • Liberal Democrat 0.8

 

Content from our partners
An old Rioja, a simple Claret,and a Burgundy far too nice to put in risotto
Antimicrobial Resistance: Why urgent action is needed
The role and purpose of social housing continues to evolve