Registered user login:

TheFaithColumn

The Faith Column

Every week a different believer gives the inside track on their religion or philosophy.

The Faith Column Homepage

The blessed gift of organisation

  • Posted by Tom Quinn
  • 18 June 2008

Tom Quinn, the New Statesman's token Mormon, explains the organization of the LDS Church in the third installment of this four-part series

Every religion seems to have its own specialty, that one aspect of worship it just seems to perform better than anyone else. Gregorian monks have their chanting, Southern Baptists have their choirs, and we Mormons have the blessed gift of organisation. Not since the fall of the Soviet Union have so many committees, subcommittees and sub-subcommittees been organised, disbanded, and subsequently reorganised in order to complete simple, day-to-day tasks.

The most important aspect of the LDS Church's organisation is the prophet and the 12 apostles that sit at its head. Not since the days of the New Testament has a Christian church been governed so, a fact in which Mormons take great pride.

Another aspect of Mormonism that sets it apart from many other Christian denominations is the fact that the Mormons employ a lay clergy. In other words, those calling the shots within the LDS Church are not pastors, theologians, or anything of the sort. In fact, most Mormons lack even the instant ordination certificates that one can get via the internet with nothing more than a few clicks and a printer. In the time it took you to read this paragraph, however, I became an ordained minister for one such online organisation. I now have the authority to assist you in all your interfaith needs. Oh yes.

Each Mormon congregation, or ward, is headed by a Bishop, an ordinary man who assumes responsibility for the well-being of the members in his area in addition to his previous professional and familial commitments. Due to the stressful nature of this job, Bishops are typically serve in 5-year terms, and almost always have more grey hair at the end of their stint than they had at the beginning.

The upside of utilising a lay clergy is increased member involvement in the day-to-day workings of the church. Giving every member his or her own responsibility creates a sense of equality and worth among those in the congregation. More importantly, this practice puts nearly everyone in a position to be able to serve someone else, which is a key facet of Christianity. Some of the best experiences I've had as a member of the LDS Church have come as a direct result of this quasi-symbiotic relationship that exists between members, though I'm almost positive I've taken much more than I've given back.

Of course, utilizing lay clergy has its drawbacks as well. Because the requirements for serving in the LDS Church require only that the individual be A) Mormon and B) breathing, not all members are capable of performing the task(s) to which they are assigned. Nevertheless, almost everyone will ultimately get his or her chance to be a leader of some sort, and some of their regimes will almost certainly end in disaster.

Truth be told, the websites and blogs of former Mormons are overflowing with complaints about Mormon leaders that are incompetent, ill-informed, or just plain crazy. Furthermore, I'd wager dollars to doughnuts that the vast majority of practising Mormons have had at least one encounter with a leader whose staggering inability to think critically makes the ramblings of Candide's Dr. Pangloss seem perfectly reasonable in comparison.

Oh well. Considering the purpose of religion is to help imperfect people, a certain amount of human error is to be expected. While you're meditating on that, I've got to be off. I'm the Second Deputy Assistant to the Undersecretary in charge of Falling Celestial Bodies, so I've been charged with the responsibility of protecting the Bishop's car from meteorites. It's a dirty job, but somebody's got to do it.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

5 comments from readers

Mormons Are Christian
18 June 2008 at 13:26

Early Christian churches, practiced baptism of youth (not infants) by immersion by the father of the family. The local congregation had a lay ministry. An early Christian Church has been re-constructed at the Israel Museum, and the above can be verified. http://www.imj.org.il/eng/exhibitions/2000/christianity/anci...

The Church of Jesus Christ (LDS) continues baptism and a lay ministry as taught by Jesus’ Apostles.

Do we know of any other denominations which practice baptism by immersion by the father of the family and a lay ministry?

hthalljr
18 June 2008 at 17:00

Thanks, Tom Quinn, for your light-hearted treatment of the blessings and pitfalls associated with our lay leadership.

In his excellent book "People of Paradox: A History of Mormon Culture," Terryl Givens points out a related situation: unlike most religious organizations, our wards and branches have set geographic boundaries, and we attend the congregation in which we reside. Thus we can't "shop around" for a more "polished," more "liberal" or more "charismatic" leader.

To me it's nothing short of a miracle that the Church can find 91,851 men (3 in each of its 2,790 stakes and 27,827 branches) who are willing to accept these leadership callings. Not only are they not paid, but like those they serve, they contribute 10% of their income for the privilege!

Tracy Hall Jr

hthalljr'gmail'com

dolores
18 June 2008 at 22:58

To "mormons are christians" could you post the exact link to the youth baptisms?

thank you

Steve45
19 June 2008 at 12:17

Tom's article is precisely correct. No paid ministry, by government or contributors, the same. My bishop is a medical facility adminstrator; previous bishops . . . psychologist for a children's psych hospital, insurance broker, physician, music professor, physics professor, cast iron pipe territorial sales manager, aerospace scientist, engineer, orthodontist, architect, etc. All successful professional people with some degree of control over their daily schedule for flexibility. Each delegates to 2 counselors of the same quality. All have been very close friends. For recordkeeping, all tithes/offerings are first recorded by computer, then deposited each Sunday in a local bank, & full disclosure transmitted by internet to church headquarters. The bank retains a nearly zero balance. Each congregation operates on a pre-determined modest budget. All other funds are directed toward worldwide humanitarian service (for Mormons & non-Mormons in harm's way), building construction & maintenance, missionary service, & church education & publication. Some modest salaries are involved for people accomplishing these tasks, & there is some contract labor. When construction of a new building is complete, it is dedicated immediately, but it is paid-for in full beforehand. No debt in the Mormon Church. There is no incentive to "line any individual's pockets". Mormons don't think about their chapel/building other than it's a sacred place for church activity. No monthly debt service, maintenance or utility bills. The only things Mormons think about are keeping the commandments, serving others, enjoying friendships & a large degree of personal well-being. It's a family church; all ages attend, from birth to death. My wife has been a member for life. I joined at age 15. It's a wonderful way of life!

Steve45
19 June 2008 at 12:47

Any male member holding at least the office of a "Priest" in the Aaronic (Levitical) Priesthood, invited by his priesthood leader & requested by the candidate (or their parents) may baptize a candidate. A father will typically take the assignment. However, I invited my older son (age 25) to baptize my younger son, but the priesthood leader in our congregation still had to approve. A candidate must be at least age 8, & must understand what they are doing. Previous to baptism, a candidate is interviewed to assure this. Unfortunately, some converts to the Mormon Church leave it later in life as anyone may read today in blogs. Clearly, they did not listen when being interviewed for baptism, or they didn't actually believe the interviewer. In other words, they probably agreed to special covenants (with God), but didn't agree in their own minds, & just wanted to get baptized . . . thinking it was no different than a nominal performance in any other faith. Baptism in the Mormon faith involves making a few serious lifetime covenants (legal agreements), not with the interviewer, but with God. At the top of the list is the question, "Are you willing to bear your brother's burdens?" Translated, are you willing to serve/help others whenever called upon, accept lay callings, etc.? Another, "Are you willing to attend regular meetings every Sunday?" Another, "Are you willing to live the gospel (keep commandments & live the best life you can per teachings in the scriptures)?" A candidate must reply "yes" to qualify for baptism. Baptism is an ordinance, not just a vehicle driver's license. There are obviously some people who just "get through the interview", & then believe they can do other than keep their covenants to which they agreed. They may bump into a leader they don't like, something that happens in any organization. As Tom says, we all do. So, they decide this is not the organization for them. They may leave quietly, unnoticed, or they may perpetuate their hurt feelings or anger as we see in the blogs. Some of these people find every reason beneath the sun to find fault with the Mormon Church. Some spend many hours researching what perhaps other offended former members have "researched" & said/published/"documented". We members try to shoulder continued responsibility to correct misconceptions/confusion, untruths perpetuated by these people by either writing articles like Tom did here, submitting comments as I've done, or adding to the many blogs out there on the subject. Thanks, Tom, for your courage & optimism.

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

You may enter up to 2000 characters (about 300-350 words)

Characters left:

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

Recent Posts

Finding Happiness

  • By Steve James
  • 21 November 2008

Judaism and the meltdown

  • By Shraga Zaltzman
  • 20 November 2008

Compassion during the crisis

  • By Matthew Jee
  • 19 November 2008

The church in the crunch

  • By Simon Barrow
  • 18 November 2008

White Poppies

  • By Symon Hill
  • 07 November 2008

Quakers and the UN

  • By Chris Walker
  • 06 November 2008

Walking the talk

  • By Eoin McCarthy
  • 05 November 2008