Richard Herring

Richard Herring Homepage

The joys of parenthood

  • Posted by Richard Herring
  • 06 May 2008

The wages are terrible, the job is 24/7 and you're contracted in for a minimum of, ooh, 18 years...

Parents should get much more credit than they do. The problem with having children is that it is a twenty-four hour job, seven days a week for (at least) eighteen years and the wages are terrible. You have to pay for the privilege.

Oh, of course, you get the joy of seeing the course of a new young life and the triumphs and disasters that will ensue. But when you’re tired and pissed off and have just done your weekly shop and have been queuing in Sainsbury’s for ten minutes, it must be difficult to remember why you wanted to be responsible for another human life in the first place. Not just another human. A really stupid human who doesn’t know anything and can’t do anything for themselves. What were you thinking?

This is the vibe that I got off the exasperated woman in front of me at the supermarket today. She was frazzled and weary, but was accompanied by her alert and curious (maybe) eight year old daughter. Now this girl was very sweet and was well behaved, not making trouble in the slightest, but even so her mum was getting to the end of her tether.

The girl spotted a magazine with Courteney Cox Arquette on the cover. “Mummy,” said the girl, pointing at the picture, but the woman pretended not to hear. “Mummy,” she said a bit louder. But Mummy was trying to unload her trolley and again feigned deafness. “Mummy,” insisted the girl, quite politely, “It’s the lady out of Friends.”

“Mmmmm,” agreed her mother, feebly pretending to be interested. Although the girl was satisfied with this, it was quite clear to the casual observer that the mother’s “Mmmmm,” was quite clearly intended as a sarcastic “Oh, is it really? I would never have recognised her if you hadn’t pointed it out. How incredibly bloody interesting.”

It’s a shame that as parents we’re not allowed just to say that sort of thing occasionally. But no, we have to nurture and reward, so a half-hearted “Mmmmm” which might mean “well done”, but could mean “sod off” is a much better option.

The mum just wanted to get her shopping checked through and get out the supermarket, so she could get home and make her family dinner, then get the kids to bed and maybe get half an hour to herself before falling into an exhausted sleep, but her child needed stimulation. Shopping is boring. She’d got that right.
She was investigating the empty till next to her and found an advertisement competition scratch card that had fallen out of a magazine. You know, one of the ones that always wins, but you have to ring up and spend £5 to discover you haven’t got the £25,000, but instead have a voucher entitling you a trifling sum off the price off a holiday that you don’t want.

“Aren’t I clever, mum?” opined the girl, seeking the approval that her mother was reluctant to give her, “I’ve found this.”

Again the mother hovered between the parental duty of counterfeiting interest and the temptation to say “And how does that make you clever exactly? It makes you nosy. In a sense it makes you a thief. That promotional leaflet belongs in a magazine that you haven’t paid for. At best I might say you were lucky to have found a worthless bit of paper on the floor. But if you were clever then such an item would have no interest for you whatsoever. I, for example, am clever and find your discovery extremely dull.”

What came out of her mouth was another “Mmmmm” and then a “let’s just try and get out of this shop.”
But the girl was excited. She had found a scratch-card which promised her the possibility of wealth beyond her tiny dreams. “Can I have a coin, mummy?”

The mother didn’t reply. She carried on putting her shopping on the conveyor belt. The girl was not discouraged, “I can use my finger nail. I’ll use my finger nail.”

Possibly relieved that this would keep her spawn quiet for a few seconds the mother let her get on with it.
Eventually the shopping was going through the till, and the mum was trying to pack the bags, but the child was excited. Unsurprisingly, she had won. “Look mummy, I’ve won.”

Everything in the woman’s demeanour suggested that she was thinking, “Of course you’ve won. It’s a promotional leaflet. They all win. It’s a scam to make you ring up an expensive phone line to discover that you haven’t won a cocking thing of any value. Why can’t you just notice that I am beyond the end of my tether and give me just a second of peace. Just a second. You parasitical, attention seeking piece of crap.”

But instead she mumbled, “That’s good!”

She was aware of her motherly duty and I felt was doing the bare minimum required to demonstrate her love and approval of the adorable (though admittedly annoying) child by her side.

Had the child been more alert she may have picked up on the weariness and the insincerity and said “Listen mum, I never asked to be born. If you didn’t want to have to humour me through my difficult childhood days then maybe you shouldn’t have let daddy put it in you. Or at least he could have worn a johnny. So get that surly look off your face and look more interested at this wonderful period of curiosity that your child is going through.”

But for now the girl was satisfied and totally unaware of the fact that her mum was suffering or of the notion that this woman might be a human being in her own right, who might have a life beyond caring for her and her insignificant concerns.

Tonight, why don’t you ring your parents and say “thank you”.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

20 comments from readers

evergrowingbrain
06 May 2008 at 11:04

Nice one. I find many of life's problems can be solved using my favorite three words.

"good little girl"

particularly apt in this case.

keep it up rich.

JohnnyW
06 May 2008 at 11:27

Ha, very true! Also, you've got to factor in the fact that children are completely useless. They just leech from society. Have you ever seen one in a decent well paid job? Have you ever seen one in ANY job? No, they just lay around all day and expect the rest of us to pick up the slack. They are, without doubt, the least productive members of our society.

Why do we put up with this?

Give a four year old a decent job, the CEO of a major company, for example, and they'll squander this opportunity by behaving SO incompetently that you have no choice but to believe that they're doing it on purpose.

Never mind immigration supposedly bringing resource sapping undesirables into our country, what the very real threat of our children?!

Louise
07 May 2008 at 13:47

evergrowingbrain wrote:

Nice one. I find many of life's problems can be solved using my favorite three words. "good little girl"

Errrrr ...........................?

I'm afraid, I find those words ("good little girl") to be patronising, condescending and possibly even a little insulting. I was slightly perturbed when you used them on Herring's last NS blog, thinking that they were directed at me.

Could you not find a new phrase or favourite little group of words -- how about:

* well done mate

* good on yer, cobber

* way to go

Anything that is less patronising than "good little girl". Pur-lease !!!!!

evergrowingbrain
07 May 2008 at 13:58

my apologies.

I didn't mean to offend.

evergrowingbrain
07 May 2008 at 19:33

my original use of the phrase in the last entry's comments was a sly "in joke" at another user of these pages. that person will know what i mean.

i then thought it especially amusing when the next blog entry was about just that. a little girl who was being good. if it wasn't for the inquisitive nature of children, we would have some very dull adults - if the response of this parent was the norm, then we'd be breeding children who would never think for themselves, never question their surroundings, and quite possibly never survive in the big world.

as it is - i like to agree with Rich, that at the end of a long day, in an often unpleasant situation, the mother in question was far from inclined to fees the kid's curiosity. I suspect as soon as they got home, and quality time started, mum was fully attentive, and using every opportunity to encourage her daughter to learn from every possible source.

sammie
07 May 2008 at 19:58

Must admit the mothers response to the child is very similar to my own response to my four year old. i tend to say things like 'mmm' or 'thats good' or 'thats nice' a lot. its not that i am ignorant of the fact my son needs to ask questions in order to learn, but it can be very draining to be asked them constantly. I have on occasion been woken during the night by my son to be asked a question (or lately to get out his telescope and help him find the man on the moon).

its not just the endless line of questions that can be frustrating, i have also found that my child will sometimes ask me a question, and when i answer it, then disagree with me... Rah!! thats so annoying

Ive learned that children can reduce you to tears one minute with frustration and tears of laughter the next, Its certainly never boring with them around!!

A very well observed piece Richard!!!

Spankabuttux
08 May 2008 at 01:59

I have the massive problem of knowing (at the age of 33) that I am not ready to be a parent, but being quite sure I would love to have at least one child in the future, partly motivated by my being the sole beneficiary of the family surname. Which may or may not make me a twat. I don't know.

Louise
08 May 2008 at 10:36

evergrowingbrain wrote:

"my original use of the phrase in the last entry's comments was a sly "in joke" at another user of these pages. that person will know what i mean"

Do you mean me ...? I have a feeling you do and I did kinda get your sly joke directed towards me on the last NS blog of Rich's, but I still didn't like the phrase "good little girl" then.

I just chose not to say anything about it at that time, feeling I had already left a few too many comments (what me?!) and I didn't really want to get into an argument with you, Evergrowingbrain either -- I just wanted to point out that the phrase "good little girl" is a bit patronising.

So if you could avoid using it again it would be appreciated.

"There's a good chap."

evergrowingbrain
08 May 2008 at 13:26

I will certainly.

The sly dig was certainly not meant for anyone called "louise".

you will also notice i didn't use the phrase in question again - merely explained it's original usage. you won't be upset by those words coming from me ever again.

I can't of course guarantee you won't be upset for other reasons. that isn't a threat by the way. I would never deliberately try to upset anyone.

If you need to speak to me more privately on this or any other matter, I am not difficult to track down.

cat osb
08 May 2008 at 13:53

Gentle, insightful and poignant.

Encapsulates well the inquisitive, intelligent child and the tired, stressed parent trying to do whatever it is that seems so urgent & important.

No doubt later in the day the parent will rue the missed opportunity to 'bond meaningfully' with her child.

Louise
08 May 2008 at 18:33

E: The sly dig was certainly not meant for anyone called "louise".

Oh, OK, soz.

I thought on the previous NS blog it was directed at me due to me having so sycophantically defended Herring's writing from a few non-appreciative comments (like a "good little .... sycophant").

You see how easy it is to misinterpret things?

Louise
08 May 2008 at 18:49

Evergrowingbrain also said:

"If you need to speak to me more privately on this or any other matter, I am not difficult to track down"

So I just found out! I was intrigued by your comment so I googled you + found a few of the interweb places where you hang out -- cool !

I am a SARF London lass but a bit too hefty (extremely hefty) for ye olde running round outside at a "decent" speed (ie average runner speeds of between 8 and 12 minute miles). I dream of being lean + fit and doing something challenging (like FLM) but at the moment it is still a pipe dream (until I work on reducing the size of my girth).

I was also impressed that you have stuck with one internet name "evergrowingbrain" in all the places you hang out + leave your reviews + comments -- it is a very unique name + easily googleable.

I have not been so clever myself. Hmmmmm ....

Bobbie
09 May 2008 at 10:36

On the train on the way into work this morning there was a BRAT screaming its head off. Sometimes it is nice being childless and 40 and watching other people's kids (especially the nice well behaved ones). Sometimes it is bl***dy awful and if I had been sitting any closer I might have been in danger of commiting infanticide.

evergrowingbrain
09 May 2008 at 11:21

I love being childless.

Last night we went to a concert and didn't have to worry about babysitters, getting back late, being up in the night, which school to send them to, which gang they'll end up in, the list could go on.

I call it doing my bit for the environment. there are too many of us out there already.

Louise
09 May 2008 at 14:01

E: I call it doing my bit for the environment

Yes, well some men have apparently taken the environmental "let's not f...k up / overcrowd the environment" argument against having babies to quite impressive levels of reasoned argument -- Herring blogged about it a while ago:

http://www.richardherring.com/warmingup/warmingup.php?id=160...

Scroll down -- the environment argument against babies starts from para 4 / 5 onwards.

evergrowingbrain
09 May 2008 at 14:46

I like it! thanks for linking that one.

I also recall Marcus Brigstock doing a fantastic rant on The Now Show a while ago on the subject. Pointing out (after travelling to China, disguising himself as the foreign minister and shouting at the prime minister)that the Chinese are doing more to protect the environment through population control/one child rules than they are to harm it through rampant industrialisation...

Michaellyncy
09 May 2008 at 14:53

Speaking with the experience of a father of 3, I'm not sure I agree with Osbornes comment re the parent rueing the missed opportunity to bond with their child.

Children are adorable and parents should of course spend time quality bonding, however to give full attention every time the child is showing interest in random and insignificant things would be emotionally impossible and mean putting adult life on hold.

Richard's observation that the parent was doing the bare minimum sounds correct, however when we see parents with their children in everyday life, these moments are only snapshots and not representative of the entire parent/child relationship.

Looking forward to seeing Herrin on Saturday at the Shed!!

Charlotte
09 May 2008 at 16:45

Sammie said: "I have on occasion been woken during the night by my son to be asked a question (or lately to get out his telescope and help him find the man on the moon)."

Your son sounds very demanding -- what will he be wanting next, the moon on a stick?

(Ha. Ha. I am funny.)

Spankabuttux
03 June 2008 at 01:59

Charlotte, not only do you have the most beautiful name ever, your sense of humour is also beautiful. I'm a bit pot-bellied at the minute, but I'm interested if you're soft with big cheeks.

Spankabuttux
09 June 2008 at 02:21

Now EVERY0NE knows why I'm single.

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

You may enter up to 2000 characters (about 300-350 words)

Characters left:

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

About the writer

Richard Herring

Richard Herring began writing and performing comedy when he was 14. His career since Oxford has included a successful partnership with Stewart Lee and his hit one-man show Talking Cock

Recent Posts

Who has special needs?

  • By Richard Herring
  • 30 January 2009

The kiss that spanned 200 years

  • By Richard Herring
  • 16 January 2009

Muntadar al-Zaidi my hero

  • By Richard Herring
  • 19 December 2008

My Tommy Cooper moment...

  • By Richard Herring
  • 05 December 2008

And the real filthmongers?

  • By Richard Herring
  • 21 November 2008

Racism and Lewis Hamilton

  • By Richard Herring
  • 06 November 2008

Not getting laid

  • By Richard Herring
  • 23 October 2008

Vote!

Will China rule the world?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 – 2009

Tracker