Registered user login:

Bright'sBlog

Bright's Blog

Politics uncovered by Martin Bright, New Statesman political editor

Bright's Blog Homepage

Brown's Henley Nemesis and the Anti-Messiah Complex

  • Posted by Martin Bright
  • 27 June 2008

The result of the by-election in Boris Johnson's old seat was no surprise, but the symbolism surrounding it speaks volumes

The Henley by-election result was crushing, but at least the Labour Party had the guts to stand a candidate. Labour's Richard McKenzie came fifth, behind the Greens and the BNP. He gained a little more than 1,000 votes and I don't know why, but somehow being in four figures just about saves him from being a joke candidate.

But I am beginning to get the terrible feeling that people are now embarrassed to vote Labour, much as they were embarrassed to vote Conservative in the run-up to 1997. Over the past year Labour has just become terminally unfashionable. When more people in Henley are happy to vote for the BNP than the Labour Party then you know you're in trouble. Although Henley should hang its collective head in shame that four per cent of its polulation are prepared to vote for neo-fascists.

The terrible reality is that while much of the negative campaigning against the Tories may be true, it makes no difference to their electoral popularity. The party is, indeed, dominated by toffs. Cameron is much more right-wing than he lets on and Osborne is an old-style union basher. But not enough people care enough to get out and do something about it.

The fact that the man who used to occupy the Henley seat now sits in City Hall as London's mayor is a terrible warning of what might yet happen nationally. Everything resonates horribly for anyone with an ounce of class resentment. Henley, Boris, Eton, the Bullingdon Club, Oxford, braying Tories in the ascendancy. It really is too much to bear. This is the 21st century, but it feels so 1980s.

The trouble for the class warriors within Labour is that the British public is clearly turned off by the apparent chippiness of the party under Brown. To a lot of people (including former Labour voters), David Cameron seems like a rather nice young man who gives the impression of being sympathetic to the needs of ordinary working men and women, despite his privileged background.

The Tory lead in the polls is starting to look decidedly solid. Even David Davis's idiosyncratic resignation and the growing difficulties of Conservative Party chairman Caroline Spelman have done nothing to boost Labour's popularity.

At the moment, things are so bad for Brown that even if he turned water into wine he would be blamed for Britain's binge drinking crisis.


Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

12 comments from readers

robertsharp
27 June 2008 at 16:48

I agree that Labour is now embarrassingly out of fashion, but I don't think it has anything to do with the party or its leader having a percieved chip or two on its shoulder. Instead I think its more a case of a general disconnect from the citizenry, a lack of humanity.

Indeed, I would say that the redeeming factor of the Labour party is its rank-and-file members who share the disillusionment of the rest of the population. Their chips are still embedded, and have not been smoothed away by 11 years in power. And a good thing too.

Mark
27 June 2008 at 16:57

Introducing racist legislation (against White people) can't help Labour's chances. The only country in Europe that is racist (and against the indigenous poulation). Surely racist legislation is against European Law?

knave
27 June 2008 at 17:19

You seem to be enjoying Browns woes. Isn't that a little vicious, cowardly and ignorant by joining a bandwagon. Shooting fish in a barrel

TottenhamLad
27 June 2008 at 23:02

"...Henley should hang its collective head in shame..." that 1066 of its electorate were still prepared to vote for Labour

adammcnestrie
28 June 2008 at 15:18

Labour’s 3% share of the vote in the Henley by-election is one of the most shocking statistics that I ever heard. In 100 years time it will be one of those scarcely credible statistics that historians use to make a more general point about the period – like the one about no one voting at all in Scotland in the 1826 General Election.

3% is a fringe party; it’s almost within the pollster’s margin of error. It’s what a crank or a weirdo gets when they insistently force themselves upon the attention of an electorate. It has to be watermark. I think that it marks the beginning of two mutually reinforcing phenomena, both of them affecting Labour supporters: shame and despair. Quite suddenly it has become shameful to profess to support Labour. You need to have some courage to do it publicly, and anyone wanting to vote Labour has to bear up under the weight of that shame. The despair comes out of the feeling that Labour is doomed, that going down to the polling booth and registering a vote for them is a pointless twilight act, a sort of pantomime of a once significant act. The Labour electorate is beset now by faithlessness.

Read more of my views at my blog, Just who the hell are we? on wordpress.com, at:

http://adammcnestrie.wordpress.com/

Roland Baker
28 June 2008 at 15:57

I am not sure that everyone in Henley-on-Thames should hang their heads in shame because the BNP got more votes than Labour. More justifiably Labour should hang its head in shame for failing to make more appeal than the BNP. If they cannot defeat the BNP, who can they defeat?

We live in a democracy. I vote for a constitutional mainstream party of the centre left. That is my duty. I am not responsible for anyone else's actual vote however much I try to appeal to their opinion. Their vote is entirely their prerogative.

My grandfather died in 1967 in his 70s and lived for 57 years with no NHS. He would be disappointed to discover that dignity for elderly people in hospitals and nursing homes remains a work-in-progress after 10 years of continuous Labour Government. Broon the Builder - can he fix it? No he can't - and until he can, there is no hope of Labour victory in a General Election.

BarBar of Oz
28 June 2008 at 22:44

Back in June last year none of the Blairites had the guts or the elan to stand against Gordon for the leadership and thus stake a claim to being considered the true successor to Tony Blair.

This political cowardice/lack of conviction mean't that when Gordon and the Brownites proved themselves so thoroughly inept and self serving the electorate/media had no-one on the Labour side to point to as Blair's true successor.

Ergo, David Cameron was anointed. It could have been David Miliband, but he sold out for the FO.

It's going to be a long and ghastly 18 months, Martin!

rhory
29 June 2008 at 15:50

The only people who vote Labour these days are new Statesman readers and immigrants, neither of which groups are particularly well represented in Henley. The BNP chime more with indigenous working class people - get over it

Cybertiger
29 June 2008 at 17:29

@rhory

"The only people who vote Labour these days are new Statesman readers and immigrants ..."

I'm a New Statesman subscriber and used to be a Labour member. At the last election, I voted 1,2,3 for STV. I'll be doing the same at the next.

knave
29 June 2008 at 22:46

I'll vote Labour purely because Bright and Cohen are voting Tory.

gnuneo
30 June 2008 at 20:00

why would people vote new-labour, when they can just openly vote tory? Therein lies the 'problem' with the electorate.

labour needs to get rid of brown, who has done bug all that blair wouldn't have done, and elect a REAL labourite, who actually cares about the People of the UK, and is not a ersatz Thatcherite.

we need to get rid of the hillary benns, and bring back the tony benns. Are there any left in the Party??

slightlyiratecouncillor
01 July 2008 at 14:08

Why no mention here in these comments of the Green Party, who claimed third place at Henley, ahead of both the BNP and Labour!

See http://www.newstatesman.com/uk-politics/2008/06/civil-libert...

for the next big thing - The Greens at Haltemprice.

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

About the writer

Martin Bright

Martin Bright began his journalistic career writing in very simple English for a magazine aimed at French school children. This experience has informed his style ever since. He worked for the BBC World Service, and The Guardian before joining the Observer as Education Correspondent. He went on to become Home Affairs Editor before becoming the New Statesman's political editor in 2005.

Recent Posts

The Death of Michael Baxandall

  • By Martin Bright
  • 19 August 2008

Walktalk Reaches London

  • By Martin Bright
  • 18 August 2008

New Statesman Investigates -- Update

  • By Martin Bright
  • 18 August 2008

Sunday Roundup - 17 August 2008

  • By Martin Bright
  • 17 August 2008

Bright's Blog Top Ten

  • By Martin Bright
  • 15 August 2008

Livingstone's £20,000 Chinese Takeaway

  • By Martin Bright
  • 15 August 2008