New Times,
New Thinking.

  1. Culture
  2. Social Media
23 November 2017

Social media and the silencing effect: why misogyny online is a human rights issue

A survey of women in eight countries shows a clear trend. 

By Azmina Dhrodia

“You could be sitting at home in your living room, outside of working hours, and suddenly someone is able to send you a graphic rape threat right into the palm of your hand.”

– Laura Bates, Founder of the Everyday Sexism Project

Every single day, billions of people around the world use social media to connect, debate, learn and share. As well as for everyday communications, social media platforms can help give a voice to the voiceless by raising the profile of some of the most marginalised groups in society. They can also be an important place to address social injustices; just last month we saw women from all over the world use social media platforms and #metoo to expose the violence, abuse and harassment they face offline.

On the other hand, the widespread inequality and discrimination against women that remains embedded in society is increasingly being replicated online. Acts of violence and abuse against women online are an extension of these acts offline.

Anecdotally, we know that online violence and abuse is widespread but there is a lack of quantitative data about the breadth and depth of online abuse women experience and its impact.

This is why Amnesty International commissioned Ipsos MORI to carry out an online poll of women aged 18–55 in the UK, USA, Spain, Denmark, Italy, Sweden, Poland and New Zealand about their experiences of online abuse or harassment on social media platforms. The findings of our online poll offer a harrowing insight into the true impact of online abuse against women:

· 23 per cent of women polled across the eight countries said they had experienced online abuse or harassment, ranging from 16 per cent in Italy to 33 per cent in the US

Give a gift subscription to the New Statesman this Christmas from just £49

· Online abuse can manifest in different ways including threats of violence, privacy violations or sexist and misogynistic comments. Of women polled who had experienced online abuse or harassment, more than a quarter (26 per cent) said they had received threats of physical or sexual assault

· Online abuse can have a serious psychological impact with women reporting stress, anxiety or panic attacks as well as lower self-esteem as a result of the abuse. Around two-thirds of women who had experienced abuse or harassment online in the UK (67 per cent), New Zealand (64 per cent) and Italy 68 per cent) stated a feeling of apprehension when thinking about using the internet or social media.

· Online abuse has a silencing or censoring effect on women with more than three quarters (76 per cent) of women across the eight countries who had experienced abuse or harassment on social media making some changes to the way they use social media platforms as a result

The prevalence of online abuse

Social media can be a toxic and frightening place for women. Amnesty’s previous research on this issue shows how women parliamentarians in the UK, especially those facing multiple and intersecting forms of discrimination, experience targeted abuse online. However, it’s important to stress that online abuse affects women from all walks of life.

Amnesty’s poll found that64 per cent of the women surveyed believe “online abuse or harassment of women is common nowadays”.This indicates that women’s experiences of online abuse are not isolated incidents but in fact are part of a wider trend of both online and offline discrimination against women.

23 per cent of the women polled said they experienced abuse or harassment online. In the USA, New Zealand and Sweden, almost one in three women stated they had experienced online abuse or harassment.

In the US, New Zealand (both 88 per cent), UK (90 per cent), Italy and Spain (both 89 per cent), almost 90 per cent of women agree that online abuse is harmful to women. These responses show that for so many women around the world, the internet is simply not a safe space.

Behind every number in this poll is a story. Although the statistics are shocking, I also wanted to hear more about the types of abuse women receive and how it makes them feel. So, I interviewed women about their experiences of online abuse, including some women with a big public profile. As I poured over the dozens of excel worksheets of the poll’s findings, my interview with Pamela Merritt, an American sexual and reproductive rights activist and blogger stuck out.

Pamela told me about the different types of violence and abuse she has faced online:

As a blogger, I’ve faced it all. I’ve had death threats, people posting racist, sexist or homophobic comments, and a lot of push back that is anti-abortion but in a hostile and violent way, like, ‘you support abortion so you deserve to die’.

She also described the response she received when she wrote a series of blog posts about police killings of black people. She recalled: “I got tweets and comments saying I am an ugly fat black bitch and that I deserve to die or ‘you wouldn’t be upset with the cops if some giant n*gger rapes you’.”

Pamela’s experience of receiving physical or sexually violent threats is not unique. Of the women polled who stated they had experienced abuse or harassment online, one quarter (26 per cent) had received threats of physical or sexual assault. Almost half (46 per cent) of the women who experienced abuse or harassment said it was sexist or misogynistic in nature.

Privacy violations such as “doxxing” and sharing sexual and private images of a woman without her consent were also forms of abuse or harassment experienced by women. One in six (17 per cent) of the women surveyed across all 8 countries who had experienced abuse or harassment said that their personal details had been posted online, with 8 per cent saying that intimate images had been posted without consent.

Additionally, almost one in three (29 per cent) of women in the US who experienced abuse or harassment online said their personal details had been posted online.

Earlier this year I also spoke to Laura Bates, founder of the Everyday Sexism Project. Like Pamela Merritt, Laura has built a public platform speaking out against daily sexism and misogyny experienced by women and uses the internet to advocate for women’s rights. We had a long phone conversation where she spoke candidly about the various forms of online violence and abuse she faced, the different platforms where it had taken place, and the changes she has made to her everyday interactions as a result.

Laura explained how her experience of online abuse has evolved over the years.

“Online abuse began for me when I started the Everyday Sexism Project — before it had become particularly high-profile or I received many entries. Even at that stage, it was attracting around 200 abusive messages per day. The abuse then diversified into other forums, such as Facebook and Twitter messages. These often spike if I’ve been in the media.”

Later, in an email, Laura sent me some of the abuse she has received recently, such as,

“You still moaning you lazy sack of shit bitch. You have sucked cock, took it up the ass, been banged till you screamed, tell me when I’m lying ? Yet you moan at men who are not hot enough or high value enough to approach you or other women. Nice way to make money Ms slut “Everyday Sexism” more like ‘Everyday Crying’”

For many women like Laura and Pamela who have experienced abuse online, especially in the form of direct or indirect threats of violence, there is a very real fear that such threats of violence will transpire offline.

Our poll found that of the women polled across all countries who experienced abuse or harassment online, almost 60 per cent had received abuse or harassment from complete strangers. Alarmingly, 41 per cent of women who had experienced online abuse or harassment said that on at least one occasion, these online experiences made them feel that their physical safety was threatened. Both Pamela and Laura explained to me that such fear is rooted in the fact that it only takes one person to follow through on a threat.

Laura explained:

“I found it difficult not to be scared about my safety initially. When people were talking about how they would track me down using the IP of the Everyday Sexism Project, my partner and I actually moved out of our flat for a short time. I also received a number of threatening messages about snipers and I found it difficult to walk around the city and tall buildings without looking over my shoulder.”

Pamela’s sense of fear was similar. She said:

“I had one incident when I got an email from the FBI; they needed to talk to me about some activity related to my blog. There was a white supremacist who was actively trying to find out where I live. That took it to another level. I had to go through all my social media to make sure I wasn’t posting if I was going to go to a party or having drinks with friends. I had to be very deliberate about my posting for a year after that.”

She added: After five years of online harassment coupled with offline harassment, I have basically reconciled with the fact that I’m prepared to die for the work I do. That might happen. If you get 200 death threats, it only takes one person who really wants to kill you.”

This bears repeating — Pamela has reconciled herself to dying for expressing herself online. The gravity of this problem has been severely underestimated.

The psychological impact of online abuse

The psychological implications of experiencing online abuse remains under-researched, and as a result, understated. There is a misconception that because the abuse is online it can simply be ignored or shrugged off. However, in the UK and US, more than three times as many woman disagree (63 per cent and 61 per cent) than agree (19 per cent in both countries) that online abuse and harassment can be stopped by just ignoring it. This rises to almost six times as many women who disagree in Denmark (64 per cent disagree, 11 per cent agree).

The assumption that online abuse is not “real” also fails to consider the myriad of harms caused by online violence and abuse that ultimately contributes to women being silenced and denied their right to freely express themselves online. In the words of Laura Bates:

The psychological impact of reading through someone’s really graphic thoughts about raping and murdering you is not necessarily acknowledged…There tends to be a general reaction of ‘if you know they’re trying to scare you, why would you be worried’?”

Dr. Emma Short, a Psychologist and Reader in Cyber Psychology at the University of Bedfordshire, talked to me about the impact of online abuse. She explained,

“I think the impact of online abuse is greater because your victimization is broadcast for everyone to see. It’s often joined by a third party so the crowd or pack is going after you. So, very quickly, it feels as though the whole world is after you. There might be positive tweets, you might have lots of friends on the outside, but if the crowd has turned against you and is after you, it feels like the world wishes you harm.”

Our findings also support this analysis.On average, 58 per cent of women in the countries polled said they had felt apprehension when thinking about using the internet or social media after experiencing abuse or harassment.

Many women I interviewed spoke about the profound psychological implications of online abuse, and how it negatively impacts the way they navigate both their online and offline realities.

Laura told me:

“There is a major psychological impact to reading somebody’s detailed fantasies about raping, assaulting and murdering you, regardless of whether or not you are actually in physical danger. This can take a major toll on women’s lives and careers, particularly if it is a sustained campaign of abuse — it’s a high price to pay for simply doing your job.”

Laura’s reaction to the violence and abuse she has experienced online is not isolated. In fact, of the women polled who experienced abuse or harassment online, more than half (56 per cent) stated that they were less able to focus on everyday tasks as a result. In addition, more than half of women (55 per cent) said they also experienced stress, anxiety or panic attacks after receiving online abuse or harassment.

Psychological Impacts of Women Who Have Experienced Abuse or Harassment Online

The poll also showed that online abuse and harassment has a serious impact on women’s self-esteem and self- confidence and led to an overwhelming feeling of powerlessness. In all countries, a large amount of women who experienced online abuse or harassment reported lower self-esteem – ranging from 43 per cent in Italy to 70 per cent in New Zealand. Across all countries, around two-thirds of these women stated feeling a sense of powerlessness after experiencing online abuse or harassment.

The psychological impact of online abuse is real and Dr. Emma Short agrees. She told me about a study she conducted in 2010 on the impact of cyberstalking — that is, when a person is engaged in a persistent course of conduct online abuse that’s causing alarm, distress and fear to another person.

“A third of people who experienced cyber stalking and who were still online reported symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder, which is enduring and very rarely alleviates without professional support…. The fear described by people who have been cyberstalked is undoubtedly a very real fear.”

The silencing effect

Another parallel between online and offline abuse is the silencing effect it has on women. Online abuse against women is increasingly being used as a tactic to publicly exert power over women and prevent them from expressing themselves freely.

Our poll showed that online abuse has a chilling effect on women’s freedom of expression.

Between 76 per cent to 85 per cent of women polled indicated that they are Facebook users. One in ten women in New Zealand were Twitter users with this rising to around a third of women polled in Spain. These figures are significant when considering that of the women polled who experienced online abuse or harassment, more than three quarters (76 per cent) across all countries made some changes to the way they used social media platforms. This figure shows just how many women alter their everyday interactions online as result of online abuse.

The specific ways in which women modified their online interactions after experiencing abuse or harassment varied between women increasing privacy and security settings or making changes to the content they post – but the number of women who made changes to the posting or sharing of expression or opinions is deeply troubling.

Roughly a third of women across all eight countries changed the way they express themselves online in response to abuse or harassment. In New Zealand this reached 44 per cent of women. In the US and UK around one in three women made changes to the content they share or express online as a result of abuse or harassment.

 

Like many of the women polled, Pamela has also made changes to the way she interacts online. She described the coping mechanisms she has developed to deal with the abuse, such as only going through comments once a day. She admitted,

“The abuse definitely makes me pause before I weigh in on anything…On the one hand, I believe very passionately that people have the right to free speech, but they don’t have the right to harass. That is a grey line, a big line.”

Laura also spoke openly about the impact online violence and abuse has on how she communicates online. She does not have a personal Facebook or Twitter account and chooses to only use social media professionally. She explained:

“In terms of my personal use of social media, it’s completely non-existent. I don’t have a Twitter account. With the amount of abuse I faced, I never set one up, I just have the Everyday Sexism account. Even my Facebook profile — which used to be very personal with photographs of friends and family and that kind of thing — is now just about my journalism and articles about Everyday Sexism, and I just don’t post anything.”

I asked Laura how it feels to no longer have a personal account or see what her friends and family are up to. She paused for a moment, sighed, and replied,

Well, when I stop and think about it, it’s actually very sad. It’s just become such a normal state that you are permanently [in a] living situation where you’re constantly looking over your shoulder and constantly worried about the safety risks. 

Despite this, both women emphasized how important social media platforms are for amplifying women’s voices, especially those with multiple and intersecting identities.

Pamela stressed:

“I think it so important that women, and women of colour particularly, stay online. It’s important that we create our own spaces where we can be safe and share ideas. We should see this harassment for what it is: an extension of the patriarchy and oppression. The goal of online harassment is to erase women and women of colour from the public dialogue. So the internet is a space where we are clearly having an impact, and this is where harassers want to silence us.”

Social media platforms must step up

Tackling online violence and abuse on social media platforms and protecting women’s rights online requires resources, transparency and coordinated action from social media companies and governments.

It’s time to move beyond mere lip-service and continued acknowledgement of the problem to concrete actions and solutions.

Social media companies have a responsibility to respect human rights and this includes the right to freedom of expression. This means ensuring that the women who use their platforms are able to do so equally, freely and without fear.

Our findings show that many women feel the response of social media companies to online abuse has been inadequate. Almost a third, or 32 per cent, of the women polled who use Facebook stated that the company’s response to dealing with abuse or harassment online was inadequate.

Twitter did not fare much better. Almost 30 per cent of women polled who are Twitter users stated the company’s response to abuse or harassment was inadequate, including 43 per cent of women users in the UK and 41 per cent in Sweden. These figures show that social media platforms have a lot more work to do when it comes to increasing the confidence and trust of their women users.

The policies of social media platforms explicitly state that they do not tolerate targeted abuse on the basis of a person’s gender or other forms of identity. But our poll findings indicate they may not be adequately enforcing these standards, and this should be a priority.

Social media platforms should also enable and empower users to use individual security and privacy measures such as blocking, muting and content filtering to curate a safer and less toxic online experience. Platforms must also ensure that moderators are trained in identifying gender and other identity-related threats and should regularly report on the scale and types of online abuse users experience, as well as the actions they have taken in this regard.

Governments also have an obligation to protect women from human rights abuses. Amnesty is calling on governments to ensure adequate laws, policies, practices and training are in place to prevent and end online violence and abuse against women. The views of women themselves show that governments in all countries polled have a lot more work to do.

On average, half of all women polled stated the current laws to deal with online abuse or harassment were inadequate, with close to 70 per centof women stating this in Italy and Sweden. In the USA, UK and New Zealand, around a third of women stated the police response to abuse and harassment online was inadequate.

Governments must urgently address this increasingly worrying issue by challenging harmful and negative gender stereotypes, investing in training on gender and other identity-based online abuse, and ensuring robust and transparent ways of reporting the problem are in place.

However, governments must not be over-zealous in their response. It is critical that no undue restrictions or penalties are placed on the legitimate exercise of freedom of expression. Tackling online violence and abuse must not be used an excuse to reduce the enjoyment of freedom of expression.

Similarly, criminal sanctions against companies who fail to remove abusive content are dangerous and risk causing more harm instead of addressing the core of the issue.

The women I interviewed agree that neither social media companies nor state authorities are doing enough to combat this problem. In the words of Laura Bates:

Social media companies aren’t stepping up and being held accountable for protecting the safety of their users. They talk a good game when something comes up in the press, but they’re not taking action.”

Pamela Merritt agrees. She told me:

I’ve reported threats to the police. In my experience they rarely take action…They made note of it, but basically I got the impression that it would be helpful to their investigation if I died, that it wasn’t something they were going to use to prevent anything.”

Amnesty’s poll shows that a large proportion of women in the countries polled believe social media platforms and governments alike are inadequately dealing with an issue that is both driving women off social media platforms and deterring women from speaking freely online.

Without urgently addressing this serious human rights issue, we risk further silencing women during a time when their voices — to some extent — are finally being heard.

As Pamela reminded me: “We need to take care of ourselves — emotionally — but this is the front line and we must not cede that space.”

Azmina Dhrodia is a researcher at Amnesty International. This is an edited version of her article, which originally appeared on Medium

Content from our partners
Building Britain’s water security
How to solve the teaching crisis
Pitching in to support grassroots football