Registered user login:

Serbia's European dawn

Simon Hooper

Published 12 May 2008

Sunday's vote reflected a public backlash against the muscular politics of the past with the nationalists' defeat seen as the death of Milosevic's Serbia

Belgrade this week was gearing up for the dubious honour of hosting the Eurovision Song contest in a fortnight's time. If ever there was a moment for Serbian opponents of all-singing, all-dancing European integration to make their point, this was surely it.

All polls in the run-up to Sunday's parliamentary elections had suggested that it was the hardline nationalists who had been making headway, fuelled by resentment towards the west over Kosovo's declaration of independence. Liberal opinion formers here talked with trepidation of a return to the bleak isolation of the 1990s and the dangers of their country sliding towards Belarus-style authoritarianism.

Instead, Serbs woke up on Monday to a bright new European dawn that few had dared to believe their troubled country – for so long an international pariah - would ever see. Victory for the Democratic Party, claiming 39 per cent of the vote, marked a clear endorsement for the pro-western vision of Serbian president Boris Tadic, who had spearheaded the party's campaign.

"This is a great day for Serbia," said Tadic as fireworks lit up the skies over Belgrade on Sunday night. "Serbia will be in the European Union. We have promised that and we will fulfil that."

Having believed that anger over Kosovo would give them the leverage they needed to win power, leaders of Serbia's Radical Party were left grasping at straws, claiming they still had the numbers to form a coalition with Kostunica and Serbian socialists.

In truth, Sunday's vote reflected a public backlash against the muscular politics of the past, with one analyst describing the nationalists' defeat as the "political death of Milosevic's Serbia".

The Radicals – which served in government under Milosevic and whose president, Vojislav Seselj, is currently on trial for war crimes at the Hague – had placed xenophobia at the heart of their campaign, telling villagers that the EU would ban them from keeping chickens and pigs in their gardens and forbid them from brewing slivovica, the home-distilled plum brandy of dizzying alcoholic content that is a Serbian national passion.

"The nationalists are stuck in the past," Ljuban Panic, a 23-year-old student from Novi Sad told me. "They believe in fear. They want to build walls. We want to knock them down."

Vojislav Kostunica, the former prime minister whose withdrawal from the ruling coalition triggered early elections, also appears to have emerged utterly discredited from a process in which he had planned to play the role of kingmaker.

A key player in the uprising that overthrew Milosevic in 2000, Kostunica has drifted since towards nationalist extremism and his campaign had been punctuated by provocative rhetoric, frequently calling Tadic a "traitor" and describing the idea of Serbia without Kosovo as "a caravan of Gypsies".

Ultimately, Kostunica and the Radicals staked all on their belief that Serbs' sense of injustice over Kosovo was so strong that they were ready to sacrifice the prosperity and optimism of the post-Milosevic era to fight for the territory at all costs.

The EU can claim at least some part in helping Serbs reject that scenario. By rushing through the signing of a pre-membership deal – overcoming objections from Belgium and the Netherlands over Serbia's continuing failure to deliver war crimes suspects Ratko Mladic and Radovan Karadzic to face justice - and measures to liberalise the visa regime for Serbian citizens, Brussels gave Tadic the ammunition he needed to keep the nationalists at bay.

Yet, having watched Yugoslavia unravel around them and with little appetite for another round of Balkan blood letting, many Serbs will privately admit as well that Kosovo is already gone. While expressing their concerns for their compatriots still living there, they accept that the territory's status is likely to be in dispute for decades and not worth the short term gains of closer ties to Europe.

Perhaps too, Serbs have a sense of historical identity that will one day enable them to come to terms with, if never fully accept, the idea of a separate Kosovo. Standing on the banks of the wide Sava river at Sabac outside of Belgrade, on the old frontier between Ottoman and Austro-Hungarian empires, is to be reminded that the dismemberment of Yugoslavia is merely the latest in a series of geopolitical shifts that have reconfigured this region over the centuries and left its inhabitants with an instinctive stoicism.

"Who cares?" replies a 78-year-old man, sitting on a bench in the afternoon sun with two similarly elderly companions, when I ask him if he has voted.

"We are old men. We remember everything. Communism and capitalism. Tito and Milosevic. The good times and the bad. The Germans bombed this town and so did the Americans. All I am worried about is my own funeral."

I dare not ask him what he thinks of Eurovision.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • NowPublic
  • Reddit

8 comments from readers

voice
13 May 2008 at 13:48

Milosevic may have been many things but he was never a Radical. Although you do not say it outright you infer that. The Radicals were in a coalition government with the Socialists during the hardest times for Serbs all over Yugoslavia.

Vojislav Kostunica was the Trojan horse, with whose help the present day government managed to claw itself into position. He was the darling of the West until his (too little, too late) battle to stop the theft of Kosovo and Metohija by the International community. The

IC decided to reward the KLA, a terrorist organisation, by giving it Serbia's Jerusalem.

The Netherlands and Brussels have never missed the opportunity to state that Serbia will not become a member of the EU until Mladic and Karadzic are given up to them as sacrificial lambs. This means that all the promises, signatures, etc. don't amount to a hill of beans. The Serbs have been sold a pup, again

My last point would be that either you are ill informed or wish to mislead on purpose. There is a very strong possibility that the Socialist, Mr. Milosevic's party will be the kingmakers in the new government.

redharry
13 May 2008 at 14:57

'Victory for the Democratic Party, claiming 39 per cent of the vote, marked a clear endorsement for the pro-western vision of Serbian president Boris Tadic'

Except they can't get a pro-western majority.

From: http://grayfalcon.blogspot.com/

'Well, what about the facts? According to CESID, a pro-Western election monitoring NGO, the May 11 election results are as follows:

Democratic Party/G17 : 103 seats

Serbian Radical Party (SRS): 77 seats

Democratic Party of Serbia (DSS)/NS: 30 seats

Socialist Party of Serbia/PUPS: 20 seats

Liberal Democratic Party (LDP): 13 seats

SDA: (Muslim parties) 4 seats

MK (Hungarian parties): 2 seats

KAL (Presevo valley Albanians): 1 seat

Total seats in the parliament: 250

If I understand correctly, it takes 126 mandates to swear in a cabinet. Let's assume the Democrats will get the LDP on board, as well as the Hungarians, Muslims and Albanians. That's still only 123 mandates.

But if the Radicals, Socialists and the DSS make a deal... they have 127 mandates right there. A majority. A government.'

I agree with the post above, Hooper is either being disingenuous - or is innumerate. Shouldn't the (acting) editor do something about this?

Admin
13 May 2008 at 15:15

My understanding is the issue hasn't been yet been resolved. That early data released by the country's election body showed a win for the pro-European parties but difficult talks are due to follow.

Ben Davies

Editor, newstatesman.com

redharry
14 May 2008 at 15:47

Thanks Ben, but the article gave the distinct impression that the issue had been resolved- and in a pro-EU direction. The facts were that anti-EU parties could form a majority, which contradicts the whole point of Hooper's piece. Aren't facts supposed to be sacred?

Hooper had a quote from Tadic, a student supporter and a non-voter. Why was he unable to find anyone who supported the majority parties?

novak
15 May 2008 at 11:11

Tadic's Democratic Party won with a clear 10 percent margin over the Radicals and it is wishful thinking on the part of sore losers to think that anything other than a Democratic-led government would be acceptable to Serbs. And it appears anyway that the Socialists are ready to cut a deal with Tadic which blows the Radicals' slim mathematical hopes of forming a coalition right out of the water: http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5jeoyTSrmmfXP6n1qPCx4r4MU...

MMMila
15 May 2008 at 12:06

Well, RedHarry, may I answer ? I live in Belgrade. Also, I met Hooper in Belgrade too.

What majority parties? Maybe SPS? Ok, I am agree they will resolve situation (who will make new goverment) but also, way you think that BEFORE election was important oppinion of SPS? Nobody didnt predict their success. DS, DSS and SRS were mentioned in each pools or statistics as important.

redharry
15 May 2008 at 14:37

Novak and MMMila

The DSS,SRS and the SPS together got a majority of the seats - and now it seems they are getting together

http://www.balkaninsight.com/en/main/news/10210/

MMMila
17 May 2008 at 20:58

Redharry, why bot DS and SPS together???

At the oment nothing is resolved. And, this is, at the moment, not a politic. This is market.

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before your comment is displayed on the website

We want to encourage people to comment on our content and to exchange views with other readers and hope this will be done on a courteous basis. However, if you encounter posts which are offensive please let us know by emailing comments@newstatesman.co.uk and we will take swift action where necessary.

Read More

Vote!

Should Tony Blair get a state funeral?